Search results
Top results related to how dom is better than xpath
Top Answer
Answered Jan 15, 2016 · 7 votes
But does this not require my hash to already be present with the attacker to compare to? And If he/she doesn't have the hash in the first place, then how does the hashing algorithm that I use, affect my sites security? And eventually he ends up having to Brute Force my login page anyways?
First, no. Many sites allow login attempts without a rate limit. With MD5, assuming the servers can handle it, a user could very rapidly attempt to brute-force passwords just by trying lots of passwords in quick succession. bcrypt's slowness guarantees that such an attempt will be much slower.
Second, a key security concept in computing is defense in depth. You don't want just one level of security - it's fairly easy to accidentally write a SQL injection vulnerability that might let an attacker dump password hashes. By using bcrypt, you limit the damage such a vulnerability can cause.
1/5
Top Answer
Answered Jul 07, 2022 · 72 votes
It's a fair question; fundamentally the difference is in the additional features Autofac can offer you if you need them. For simple applications, the Microsoft DI may offer enough functionality, but I've found as my application grows there's some extra features I find myself wanting/needing.
The features that in my mind encouraged me to originally start using Aufofac are:
- Tagged lifetime scopes, and scoping services to those tags (https://autofaccn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/lifetime/instance-scope.html#instance-per-matching-lifetime-scope)
- Resolving a service with some associated Metadata (https://autofaccn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/advanced/metadata.html)
- Defining Named/Keyed variants of a service (https://autofaccn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/advanced/keyed-services.html)
- Resolving a factory function that you can use whenever you want (https://autofaccn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/resolve/relationships.html#dynamic-instantiation-func-b)
- Lazy Instantiation (https://autofaccn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/resolve/relationships.html#delayed-instantiation-lazy-b)
- The ability to combine all of these at your leisure (e.g. Meta<Lazy<IMyService>>)
There's plenty more, but those are some of my favourite features. Check the docs for all the goodness.
Also, there's no reason you can't start using the built-in DI and then add Autofac later when you realise you need it. The Autofac ASP.NET Core integration (https://autofaccn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/integration/aspnetcore.html) will just pick up all your existing registrations, and then you can add those extra features on top.
In the interest of full disclosure here, I will point out that I am one of the maintainers of Autofac.
2/5
JavaScript is a front-end programming language for the web, it is a lightweight and most commonly used front-end programming language. It also uses to manipulate and validate the data. JavaScript framework is basically JavaScript code libraries in which pre-written code is used. Using those codes we can create websites and web applications. Below are the main types of JavaScript frameworks.
- React.js
- Angular.js
- Vue.js
1. React.js
It is an Open Source client-side library developed by Facebook. It very simple and scalable and uses to create single-page applications or mobile applications. It can easily use with the help of JavaScript libraries and angular js model view controller, and it also provides a single-way data flow. It uses the one-way binding.
Features of ReactJS
- Use the JSX extension react.js is a JavaScript syntax extension. It is necessary to use a JSX extension when you save your application.
- It works as a component. In React.js, everything is a component. It helps to maintain the code when working on large-scale projects.
Advantages of ReactJS
- ReactJS uses virtual DOM (Document Object Model). Virtual DOM improves application performance react.js much faster than regular DOM.
Disadvantages of ReactJS
- React.js uses a huge size library.
- In react not provide good documentation
2. AngularJS
Angular is a client-side MVC-based framework. It provides a good design and interactive look to our website. JavaScript. AngularJS changes static HTML content to dynamic Html content, and it also provides a custom attribute option.
Features of AngularJS
- Angular supports MVC architecture.
- It provides angular CLI.
- It provides data binding.
Advantages of Angular
- In angular js, you can use the reusable component.
- It is helpful for dynamic client-side applications.
Disadvantages of Angular
- The angular framework is quite complex to learn.
- Angular provides a limited SEO option.
3. Vue.js
It is a JavaScript framework and uses to design interactive front-end applications. It works on...
- Vue.js uses virtual DOM (Document Object Model).
- It provides data binding.
- It provides animation and transition of the element.
- Vue.js is a lightweight framework.
- Vue.js provides build-in libraries and, we can easily use these libraries in our code.
- It is a small-size framework.
- Vue.js is easy to understand and smoothly developed the application.
- Vue.js provides detailed documentation.
- Vue.js provides two-way communication.
- Vue.js simple to integrated.
- Vue.js provides a few the plugin.
- It is developed by a small community.
- It does not support large types of projects.
- Forms and validation feature.
- Dependency injection features.
- Routing features.
- Layout features.
- Make web application using C#.
- It provides an interactive look to our website.
- Blazor server allows the application to run on the server-side.
- In the Blazor web assembly, code can be share client-side and server-side.
- It is not compatible with all browsers. It is compatible only with a modern browser.
- Small communities developed the Blazor web assembly in comparison to Angular or React.js.
- Client: The app directly executes on the web browser on web assembly based on runtime. It is also called static Blazor web assembly.
- Server: The component in this running on the server-side. It is also called dynamic Blazor web assembly. It is smaller and, the application load faster.
- Blazor and React used for web app builders. Both frameworks are open-source. React has detailed JavaScript libraries for the developed interactive user interface.
- Blazor has a UI framework use C# programming language and, HTML Razor runs with the help of a browser using web assembly. In Blazor incremental DOM is used but in react virtual, DOM use. In Blazor, no need for a plugin and, it also provides server-side rendering. React does not provide server-side rendering. Blazor is more efficient than react and, Blazor also provides .net debugging.
- Both are open-source. Angular is on JavaScript and, Blazor supports C# programming language.
- Angular is a production-ready framework. The Blazor uses one-way binding, Whereas Angular uses two-way binding.
- Angular uses regular DOM and, Blazor uses incremental DOM.
- Angular uses Typescript language and, Blazor uses web assembly and C# language.
- For unit testing and debugging uses Jasmine Tool in Angular, Whereas Blazor testing and debugging using the Blazor testing placeholder. Angular fully supports PWA but, Blazor can’t work with PWA. Angular does not support server-side rendering, Whereas blazor supports server-side rendering.
- Both are open-source framework.Vue.js uses JavaScript framework and, Blazor uses web assembly. Blazor provides one-way binding, Whereas vue.js provide two-way binding.Vue.js used typescript and JavaScript language, Whereas Blazor uses only typescript language. Angular uses virtual DOM, whereas Blazor uses incremental DOM.
3/5
JavaScript is a front-end programming language for the web, it is a lightweight and most commonly used front-end programming language. It also uses to manipulate and validate the data. JavaScript framework is basically JavaScript code libraries in which pre-written code is used. Using those codes we can create websites and web applications. Below are the main types of JavaScript frameworks.
- React.js
- Angular.js
- Vue.js
1. React.js
It is an Open Source client-side library developed by Facebook. It very simple and scalable and uses to create single-page applications or mobile applications. It can easily use with the help of JavaScript libraries and angular js model view controller, and it also provides a single-way data flow. It uses the one-way binding.
Features of ReactJS
- Use the JSX extension react.js is a JavaScript syntax extension. It is necessary to use a JSX extension when you save your application.
- It works as a component. In React.js, everything is a component. It helps to maintain the code when working on large-scale projects.
Advantages of ReactJS
- ReactJS uses virtual DOM (Document Object Model). Virtual DOM improves application performance react.js much faster than regular DOM.
Disadvantages of ReactJS
- React.js uses a huge size library.
- In react not provide good documentation
2. AngularJS
Angular is a client-side MVC-based framework. It provides a good design and interactive look to our website. JavaScript. AngularJS changes static HTML content to dynamic Html content, and it also provides a custom attribute option.
Features of AngularJS
- Angular supports MVC architecture.
- It provides angular CLI.
- It provides data binding.
Advantages of Angular
- In angular js, you can use the reusable component.
- It is helpful for dynamic client-side applications.
Disadvantages of Angular
- The angular framework is quite complex to learn.
- Angular provides a limited SEO option.
3. Vue.js
It is a JavaScript framework and uses to design interactive front-end applications. It works on...
- Vue.js uses virtual DOM (Document Object Model).
- It provides data binding.
- It provides animation and transition of the element.
- Vue.js is a lightweight framework.
- Vue.js provides build-in libraries and, we can easily use these libraries in our code.
- It is a small-size framework.
- Vue.js is easy to understand and smoothly developed the application.
- Vue.js provides detailed documentation.
- Vue.js provides two-way communication.
- Vue.js simple to integrated.
- Vue.js provides a few the plugin.
- It is developed by a small community.
- It does not support large types of projects.
- Forms and validation feature.
- Dependency injection features.
- Routing features.
- Layout features.
- Make web application using C#.
- It provides an interactive look to our website.
- Blazor server allows the application to run on the server-side.
- In the Blazor web assembly, code can be share client-side and server-side.
- It is not compatible with all browsers. It is compatible only with a modern browser.
- Small communities developed the Blazor web assembly in comparison to Angular or React.js.
- Client: The app directly executes on the web browser on web assembly based on runtime. It is also called static Blazor web assembly.
- Server: The component in this running on the server-side. It is also called dynamic Blazor web assembly. It is smaller and, the application load faster.
- Blazor and React used for web app builders. Both frameworks are open-source. React has detailed JavaScript libraries for the developed interactive user interface.
- Blazor has a UI framework use C# programming language and, HTML Razor runs with the help of a browser using web assembly. In Blazor incremental DOM is used but in react virtual, DOM use. In Blazor, no need for a plugin and, it also provides server-side rendering. React does not provide server-side rendering. Blazor is more efficient than react and, Blazor also provides .net debugging.
- Both are open-source. Angular is on JavaScript and, Blazor supports C# programming language.
- Angular is a production-ready framework. The Blazor uses one-way binding, Whereas Angular uses two-way binding.
- Angular uses regular DOM and, Blazor uses incremental DOM.
- Angular uses Typescript language and, Blazor uses web assembly and C# language.
- For unit testing and debugging uses Jasmine Tool in Angular, Whereas Blazor testing and debugging using the Blazor testing placeholder. Angular fully supports PWA but, Blazor can’t work with PWA. Angular does not support server-side rendering, Whereas blazor supports server-side rendering.
- Both are open-source framework.Vue.js uses JavaScript framework and, Blazor uses web assembly. Blazor provides one-way binding, Whereas vue.js provide two-way binding.Vue.js used typescript and JavaScript language, Whereas Blazor uses only typescript language. Angular uses virtual DOM, whereas Blazor uses incremental DOM.
4/5
Top Answer
Answered Mar 30, 2017 · 62 votes
request.getContextPath()- returns root path of your application, while ../ - returns parent directory of a file.
You use request.getContextPath(), as it will always points to root of your application. If you were to move your jsp file from one directory to another, nothing needs to be changed. Now, consider the second approach. If you were to move your jsp files from one folder to another, you'd have to make changes at every location where you are referring your files.
Also, better approach of using request.getContextPath() will be to set 'request.getContextPath()' in a variable and use that variable for referring your path.
<c:set var="context" value="${pageContext.request.contextPath}" /><script src="${context}/themes/js/jquery.js"></script>-
PS- This is the one reason I can figure out. Don't know if there is any more significance to it.
5/5
stackoverflow.com › questions › 5279786Performance of XPath vs DOM - Stack Overflow
stackoverflow.com › questions › 5279786May 29, 2012 · Which browser's implementation of XPath is better? As the answer in xPath vs DOM API, which one has a better performance says, average programmer may screw up when implementing complicated tasks (e.g. multiple axes involved) in DOM way while XPath is guaranteed optimized.
- XPath and DOM are both specifications, not implementations. You can't ask questions about the performance of a spec, only about specific implementa...
- This page has a section where you can run tests to compare the two and see the results in different browsers. For instance, for Chrome, xpath is 10...
- I agree with Michael that it may depends on implementation, but I would generally say that DOM is faster. The reason is because there is no way tha...
stackoverflow.com › questions › 16671642DOM vs XPath - Difference? - Stack Overflow
stackoverflow.com › questions › 16671642May 21, 2013 · 1 Answer. Sorted by: 16. They are complementary rather than competing. DOM provides a tree model of XML with low-level navigation capability (get first child, get next sibling, etc); XPath adds a much higher-level search and navigation capability (e.g. get the average price of all books, get the title of the last chapter).
softwareengineering.stackexchange.com › questionsjavascript - xpath vs DOM API - Software Engineering Stack ...
softwareengineering.stackexchange.com › questionsNov 2, 2011 · 4. I just came up on xpath recently while writing a greasemonkey script and immediately fell in love. I haven't done any benchmarking yet (coming soon), but according to a couple sources that I read, xpath is faster than using the DOM API.
medium.com › @codezone › efficient-dom-manipulationEfficient DOM Manipulation: Using jQuery and XPath
medium.com › @codezone › efficient-dom-manipulationAug 11, 2023 · Two popular tools for DOM manipulation are jQuery and XPath. In this article, we’ll explore how to use these tools to efficiently handle the DOM, providing tips and best practices along the way....
- Codezone
developer.mozilla.org › en-US › docsIntroduction to using XPath in JavaScript - XPath | MDN
developer.mozilla.org › en-US › docsDec 20, 2023 · Mozilla implements a fair amount of the DOM 3 XPath, which means that XPath expressions can be run against both HTML and XML documents. The main interface to using XPath is the evaluate function of the document object. document.evaluate ()
People also ask
What is the difference between XPath and Dom?
- They are complementary rather than competing. DOM provides a tree model of XML with low-level navigation capability (get first child, get next sibling, etc); XPath adds a much higher-level search and navigation capability (e.g. get the average price of all books, get the title of the last chapter).
DOM vs XPath - Difference? - Stack Overflow
stackoverflow.com/questions/16671642/dom-vs-xpath-differenceIs XPath better than jQuery?
- Both jQuery and XPath offer valuable tools for efficient DOM manipulation. jQuery simplifies common tasks with a concise and consistent API, making it an excellent choice for many projects. On the other hand, XPath provides precise navigation and querying capabilities, ideal for complex DOM structures.
Efficient DOM Manipulation: Using jQuery and XPath - Medium
medium.com/@codezone/efficient-dom-manipulation-using-jquery-and-xpath-60b788dbabd9Does XPath have a DOM parser?
- DOM, SAX and XPath are different APIs for accessing a document; but only DOM and SAX are parsers of a document. Unless some #C does a parser for XPath that we don't know about? BTW: your linked XSQ uses SAX for parsing underneath - it doesn't have a specific XPath parser.
xml - Is XPath much more efficient as compared to DOM and SAX? …
stackoverflow.com/questions/689097/is-xpath-much-more-efficient-as-compared-to-dom-and-saxWhy is XPath better than CSS?
- Simple – versatility, and power. XPath is a language developed for working with XML documents; as such, it allows for much more powerful constructs than CSS. For example, navigation in every direction in the tree—find an element, then go to its grandparent and search for a child of it having certain properties.
selenium - What is the difference between a CSS and XPath selector? And
stackoverflow.com/questions/16788310/what-is-the-difference-between-a-css-and-xpath-selector-and-which-is-better-witdeveloper.mozilla.org › en-US › docsXPath | MDN - MDN Web Docs
developer.mozilla.org › en-US › docsXPath is mainly used in XSLT, but can also be used as a much more powerful way of navigating through the DOM of any XML-like language document using XPathExpression, such as HTML and SVG, instead of relying on the Document.getElementById() or Document.querySelectorAll() methods, the Node.childNodes properties, and other DOM Core features.
www.33rdsquare.com › xpath-vs-cssXPath vs CSS Selectors: A Comprehensive Guide for Web ...
www.33rdsquare.com › xpath-vs-cssOct 28, 2023 · October 28, 2023 by Jordan Brown. Selecting elements on a web page is an essential skill for both front-end developers and scrapers. The two main methods available are XPath and CSS selectors. Choosing the right one can have a significant impact on your project.
Searches related to how dom is better than xpath
