Search results
Jan 23, 2007 · Metaethics. First published Tue Jan 23, 2007; substantive revision Tue Jan 24, 2023. Metaethics is the attempt to understand the metaphysical, epistemological, semantic, and psychological, presuppositions and commitments of moral thought, talk, and practice. As such, it counts within its domain a broad range of questions and puzzles, including ...
t. e. In metaphilosophy and ethics, metaethics is the study of the nature, scope, and meaning of moral judgment. It is one of the three branches of ethics generally studied by philosophers, the others being normative ethics (questions of how one ought to be and act) and applied ethics (practical questions of right behavior in given, usually ...
Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words. Learn about the history, issues, and positions of metaethics, from Plato to the present.
People also ask
What is metaethics in philosophy?
Why is metaethics important?
What is the difference between normative ethics and metaethics?
What is a good book about meta-ethics?
Metaethics is the branch of ethics that examines the nature and justification of moral judgments and theories. Learn about the main metaethical positions, such as naturalism, nonnaturalism, emotivism and prescriptivism, and their implications for moral philosophy.
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
This web page is part of a free textbook on philosophy, but it has a glitch and cannot be accessed. Metaethics is the branch of ethics that examines the nature and justification of moral judgments.
Feb 26, 2020 · A comprehensive overview of metaethics, the philosophical study of the nature of moral judgment. Find key concepts, theories, arguments, and sources on realism, non-realism, naturalism, non-naturalism, and more.
Mar 10, 2021 · Metaethics is the study of how we engage in ethics. Thus, the metaethicist has a role more similar to a football commentator rather than to a referee or player. The metaethicist judges and comments on how the ethical game is being played rather than advancing practical arguments, or kicking the football, themselves.
