Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Feb 24, 2015 · The IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) are a prominent example of such an expert review process. The goal of the Monograph Programme is to assess carcinogenic hazards from occupational, environmental, and lifestyle exposures and agents, thus providing an ...

  2. Lyon, France, May 31, 2011 ‐‐ The WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer1, associated with wireless phone use.

  3. Human Cancer: Known Causes and Prevention by Organ Site This poster presents carcinogenic agents and cancer-preventive interventions by organ site READ MORE

  4. May 31, 2011 · Flickr. Mobile phones are “possibly carcinogenic to humans”, according to a new by the World Health Organisation’s cancer agency, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The ...

  5. possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) based on . limited. evidence for cancer in humans (for hepatocellular carcinoma, a type of liver cancer). Among the available cancer studies in humans, there were only three studies on the consumption of artificially sweetened beverages that allowed an assessment of the

  6. List of Classifications – IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans.

  7. Inadequate: The IARC report does not measure the risk of cancer but only categorizes substances based on their properties and behavior. It does not provide any details regarding the level of harm posed by the substances. Even smoking and red meat, which are both Grade 1, cannot be compared for cancer incidence.