Search results
Mar 27, 2022 · Even people who claim that they believe that the Theory of Normative Ethical Relativism are correct to make moral judgments concerning the practices of people in other cultures. For example, they do condemn female infanticide and genital mutilation and a number of other practices, even practices that go back many centuries.
Let’s look at some other examples of moral claims: “You shouldn’t lie to someone just to get out of an uncomfortable situation.”. “It’s wrong to afflict unnecessary pain and suffering on animals.”. “Julie is a kind and generous person.”. “Abortion is morally permissible if done within the first trimester.”.
Apr 24, 2023 · The three dominant normative ethical theories are consequentialist, deontological, and virtue ethics. In order, they point toward the action's consequences, the agent's moral obligations, and ...
Oct 3, 2022 · Abstract. This is a paper about the methodology of normative ethics. I claim that much work in normative ethics can be interpreted as modelling, the form of inquiry familiar from science, involving idealised representations. I begin with the anti-theory debate in ethics, and note that the debate utilises the vocabulary of scientific theories ...
The four major types of factors are as follows: (1) overall goodness of results; (2) general constraints; (3) special obligations; and (4) options. Although I do not intend to go into great detail about any one of these groups, I want to say enough-if only by way of offering some examples-to give.
Apr 17, 2002 · Wong (1984, 2006, 2014) claims to be an ethical relativist because he denies that there is any universal moral code that would be endorsed by all rational people. But what seems to stand behind this claim is the idea that there are cultural variations in the relative weights given to, for example, considerations of justice and considerations of ...
Apr 21, 2010 · Second, when not committing this fallacy, it is claimed that scientific ethics fails in demonstrating the relevance of science for normativity because science cannot offer a foundation for ethics (e.g., Farber 1994; Woolcock 1999; Rosenberg 2000; see Sect. 2.1 ). While the first criticism is often debated, the second criticism is not ...
