Search results
Feb 2, 2024 · The legal analysis in State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan delves into the constitutional tapestry woven by the framers of the Constitution. The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Harilal Kania, grapples with the intricate balance between ensuring social justice through affirmative action and upholding the cherished principle of equality.
CHENNAI: The Madras high court on Thursday refused to quash a hate speech case against Tamil Nadu Bharatiya Janata Partry chief K Annamalai over his claim in a 2022 interview that an international ...
The Tribunal purported to follow the decision of this court in T.C No. 17 of 1964. 2. Therefore, the only question that has to be considered in this case is whether the turnover relating to the assessee's sale of scrap iron is a second sale as contended by the assessee or whether it is a first sale as contended by the revenue.
Conclusion. The Court concluded that Section 15 (2) (b) of the Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 as amended by the Indian Criminal Law Amendment (Madras) Act, 1950, falls outside the scope of authorised restrictions under clause (4) of Article 19 and is, therefore, unconstitutional and void. The appeal was dismissed with costs.
May 27, 2020 · 7. CASE ANALYSIS. FACTS OF A. K. GOPALAN V. STATE OF MADRAS. In A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, A.K. Gopalan was a communist leader who had been imprisoned by the state of Madras in 1947 under convictions of ordinary criminal law, however those convictions were set aside. While he was imprisoned, he was served with another order of detention ...
In the landmark case of Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950), the Indian judiciary confronted critical constitutional issues regarding freedom of speech and expression against the backdrop of governmental actions aimed at maintaining public order. Romesh Thappar, a prominent communist figure, found himself at odds with the Madras government ...
Feb 7, 2006 · System of Precedents and Appeals. The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest appeals body in Canada’s judicial system.It is the final arbiter of law in a court system based primarily on common law (using judicial precedent) and on respect for the rule of stare decisis — the notion that courts of appeal may modify or overturn lower court decisions, to ensure there is uniform application of ...
