Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Sep 18, 2023 · A minority of supervisors reported that they had never (17%) or had rarely (15%) been engaged in co-supervision. Also, the number of those who exclusively engaged in co-supervision was low (10%). According to the supervisors, the size of the supervisory team was typically two (52%) to three (42%) supervisors.

  2. Co-supervisors can have an important 'hands-on' role regarding the methods, analyses and daily research matters. Cite. 1 Recommendation. Muhammad Javed. The Islamia University of Bahawalpur.

  3. Jul 3, 2023 · Taking the supervisors’ perspective on co-supervision, Johansen et al. (Citation 2019) found that the supervisors had a shared perception of the power dynamics of a team, where the main supervisor is expected to act if challenges arise and also have the primary responsibility for the supervisory process.

  4. Jun 27, 2022 · Co-supervision also means that the two supervisors do in some cases the same work (e.g., reading the supervisee's chapter, going to meetings) so overall on an institutional level, they spend more time with supervision than in cases where there is only one supervisor. This also raises the question of cost-efficiency (Ukwoma & Ngulube, 2020).

  5. Tao Cheng, M Computer Science (4 unit, one semester): Cyber attacks to distributed AI systems, S2 only, 2022. Zhe Sun (co-supervision), Master: Fuzzing for DL systems, from S1 2022 to S2 2022. Xiaojie Issac Ying (co-supervision), Master, Fuzzing for DL systems, from S1 2022 to S2 2022. Yifan Lu, Master: ATT&CK graph, S 1, 2022 (one semester).

  6. Jan 1, 2014 · The purpose of this paper is to examine the advantages and challenges of co-supervision of doctoral students, as found in the literature and from our experiences. We define co-supervision and then discuss the process in detail. Examples are based on experiences of co-supervision from faculty perspectives as well as from the point of view of a former doctoral student. We propose that the ...

  7. Nov 22, 2017 · Comparison of the two fragment positions in the fusion with the PB2 proteins for HT-GPCA. (a) HEK-293T cells were transfected with a set of plasmids expressing, fused to the Glc1 fragment of the G. princeps luciferase, proteins known to interact with PB2 (PRS) or randomly chosen as a priori not interacting with PB2 (RRS) and PB2 proteins fused to the Glc2 fragment at the C or N terminus.