Search results
The Eclipse SDK codebase was originally distributed under the CPL. The EPL 1.0 was derived from CPL version 1.0. As a result, much of the information provided in the Common Public License (CPL) Frequently Asked Questions document is relevant to the EPL, as well. The purpose of this FAQ is to highlight the differences.
The Eclipse SDK codebase was originally distributed under the CPL. The EPL 1.0 was derived from CPL version 1.0. As a result, much of the information provided in the Common Public License (CPL) Frequently Asked Questions document is relevant to the EPL, as well. The purpose of this FAQ is to highlight the differences.
Nov 2, 2021 · The Eclipse Public License (EPL) is a weak copyleft open source license maintained by the Eclipse Foundation. There are two versions of the EPL — the original EPL-1.0, which was released in 2004, and the EPL-2.0, which was published in 2017. The EPL-1.0 has been deprecated (and the Eclipse Foundation recommends OSS contributors consider ...
Eclipse Public License (EPL)は、ビジネス向けのフリーソフトウェアライセンスの1つとして設計され、 GPL などの同時期のライセンスより、提供の際の コピーレフト 性が弱められている。. EPLライセンスされた プログラム の受領者は、使用・修正・コピーや、修正 ...
eclipse public license - v 2.0. the accompanying program is provided under the terms of this eclipse public license (“agreement”). any use, reproduction or distribution of the program constitutes recipient's acceptance of this agreement. 1. definitions “contribution” means:
Jul 20, 2020 · What is the difference between the Eclipse Public License and the Apache License? The Apache License 2.0 doesn’t force you to release your modified version of the Apache Licensed code. Besides, if you’d like, you can choose to release your modified version under a different license (however, you’re required to retain the Apache License ...
We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.
