Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Jul 14, 2023 · IARC classified aspartame as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) on the basis of limited evidence for cancer in humans (specifically, for hepatocellular carcinoma, which is a type of liver cancer). There was also limited evidence for cancer in experimental animals and limited evidence related to the possible mechanisms for causing cancer.

  2. Epidemiology of HPV-associated cancers past, present and future: towards prevention and elimination. In a new review article, researchers from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) ... IARC hosts second annual meeting of DISCERN project. Researchers from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) are hosting the ...

  3. Jun 29, 2023 · IARC have, however, now changed the name to “IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans”, which at least describes what they actually do. And at least, this time, there will be a risk assessment published by JEFCA, at the same time as the IARC assessment.

  4. Apr 2, 2012 · It may also be used when there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals“. The Category 2B “possible carcinogen” classification does not mean that an agent is carcinogenic. As Ken Foster of the University of Pennsylvania pointed out to me.

  5. The principles, procedures, and scientific criteria that guide the evaluations are described in the Preamble to the IARC Monographs. Since 1971, more than 1000 agents have been evaluated, of which more than 500 have been identified as carcinogenic, probably carcinogenic, or possibly carcinogenic to humans.

  6. May 31, 2011 · Mobile phones are “possibly carcinogenic to humans”, according to a new by the World Health Organisation’s cancer agency, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The IARC ...

  7. carcinogenicity and mechanistic and other relevant data. The terms probably carcinogenic and possibly carcinogenic have no quantitative significance and are used simply as descriptors of different levels of evidence of human carcinogenicity, with probably carcinogenic signifying a higher level of evidence than possibly carcinogenic. Group 2A ...

  1. People also search for