Search results
Mar 24, 2017 · Equitable estoppel is a legal principle that stops someone from taking a legal action that conflicts with his previous claims or behaviors. Essentially, equitable estoppel is a method of preventing someone from going back on his word in a court of law.
Equitable estoppel is a defensive doctrine preventing one party from taking unfair advantage of another when, through false language or conduct, the person to be estopped has induced another person.
Estoppel is an equitable doctrine, a bar that prevents one from asserting a claim or right that contradicts what one has said or done before, or what has been legally established as true. Estoppel may be used as a bar to the re-litigation of issues or as an affirmative defense.
equitable estoppel - A principle preventing a party from gaining legal advantages if they've engaged in unfair actions or deception, such as lying or hiding important facts.
Estoppel in pais (also called equitable estoppel) is a defense doctrine that prevents a party from using a right against another party when the right arises out of misleading actions from the person claiming the right.
A legal principle that bars a party from denying or alleging a certain fact owing to that party's previous conduct, allegation, or denial. The rationale behind estoppel is to prevent injustice owing to inconsistency or Fraud. There are two general types of estoppel: equitable and legal.
Equitable estoppel, or 'fair prevention,' is a legal principle that prevents someone from going back on their word or actions when another party has reasonably relied on those representations.
Jan 5, 2015 · Laches or Equitable Estoppel. Laches is a form of equitable estoppel in which one party claims the other has failed to assert its rights in the matter. The delay in such a case must be shown to have resulted in evidence or witnesses no longer being available, or circumstances to have changed during the delay making it unjust to grant the ...
Jul 12, 2013 · This article considers how the law of equitable estoppel, including decisions such as Thorner v Major, can best be understood; one of its aims is to provide a more precise account of the principle applied in Thorner. Its focus will be on the two principal forms of equitable estoppel: promissory estoppel and proprietary estoppel.
Feb 19, 2015 · Estoppel. The general rule is that the federal government may not be equitably estopped from enforcing public laws, even though private parties may suffer hardship as a result in particular cases. Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond, 496 U.S. 414 (1990); Heckler v.
