Search results
Feb 18, 2022 · 29. Pros: If one supervisor gets hit by a bus, you still have a second supervisor who is familiar with your work and can thus give constructive comments on it, hopefully appreciate it and in particular evaluate it. Often, your supervisor is the only person at your university who is actually capable of fully understanding and properly judging ...
Mar 26, 2024 · However, the smaller body of research on co-supervision, to which we are contributing, argues that supervisors need to consider one another, too, in terms of power dynamics, care and managing constructive relationships (Wald et al., 2023). Building Relationships in Co-Supervision
People also ask
Do the four I s drive co-supervision in doctoral education?
When do two supervisors come out naturally?
What happens if a second supervisor is formally recognised?
What are the benefits and challenges of co-supervision?
Jun 27, 2022 · Co-supervision also means that the two supervisors do in some cases the same work (e.g., reading the supervisee's chapter, going to meetings) so overall on an institutional level, they spend more time with supervision than in cases where there is only one supervisor. This also raises the question of cost-efficiency (Ukwoma & Ngulube, 2020).
In addition, all students who began their studies before the merger should have two supervisors by 2020. There are several ways in which co-supervision can be positive for all involved, such as: Complementary expertise, either in terms of the topic or the processes of supervision. Continuity if one supervisor is absent or leaves.
3. Supervisory relationships with co-supervisors. Full: Required. Associate: Required. Historically, the model has been for candidates to have a single supervisor. But over the last three decades or so there has been a move to co- or team supervision to enhance the experience of doctoral candidates by reducing their reliance upon a single ...
(4) efforts to improve the quality of supervision. This review of research evidence focused on understanding the four Is as drivers of co-supervision in doctoral education; specifically, by analysing benefits and challenges of co-supervision. A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA‑P protocol for peer-reviewed articles ...
We investigated how co-supervision could effectively and efficiently be implemented within the Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits). Co-supervision (also called joint or dual supervision) is used to support 33–70% of all South African PhD candidates1 and can take various forms. On the one hand, a
