Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Andrew Feenberg (born 1943) is an American philosopher. He holds the Canada Research Chair in the Philosophy of Technology in the School of Communication at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver. His main interests are philosophy of technology , continental philosophy , critique of technology and science and technology studies .

  2. Andrew Feenberg is a professor of communication and technology at Simon Fraser University and a leading scholar of critical theory. He has written several books on technology, modernity, and philosophy, and has also contributed to online education and the May Events archive.

  3. In Technosystem, Andrew Feenberg builds a theory of both the threats of technocratic modernity and the potential for democratic change. Feenberg draws on the tradition of radical social criticism represented by Herbert Marcuse and the Frankfurt School, which recognized the social effects of instrumental rationality but did not advance a ...

  4. Jun 12, 2018 · Abstract. Feenbergs Technosystem offers an engaging, lucid and important critique of technical rationality, the defining feature of modernity. With an approach labeled Critical Constructivism, he develops tools for countering the dominating force of our rational culture by combining insights from Critical Theory and Science and Technology ...

  5. I am a philosopher of technology and a student of Critical Theory. This channel contains videos of my lectures given at universities around the world. I've uploaded my course on philosophy of...

  6. May 17, 2023 · Andrew Feenberg is a pioneer in the development of the philosophy of technology and a critic of modernity. In this interview, he discusses the relationship between universality and particularity, Eurocentrism and science, and the role of dialectical thought in understanding socio-technical orders.

  7. People also ask

  8. Andrew Feenbergs new book is a tour de force. With detailed yet crystal-clear analyses of Marcuse’s major writings in their historical context, it reconstructs the implicit ontology of meaning that sustains Marcuse’s unique version of critical theory.

  1. People also search for