Peter Falk
Vince Ricardo
Search results
The In-Laws is a 1979 American action comedy film [3] [4] starring Alan Arkin and Peter Falk, written by Andrew Bergman and directed by Arthur Hiller. It was filmed on various locations, including Mexico , which served as the film's representation of the fictional Central American setting.
Sep 12, 1979 · The In-Laws: Directed by Arthur Hiller. With Peter Falk, Alan Arkin, Richard Libertini, Nancy Dussault. On the eve of their children's marriage, NYC in-laws Sheldon Kornpett and Vince Ricardo embark on a series of misadventures involving the CIA, the Treasury Department and Central American dictators.
- (10K)
- Action, Adventure, Comedy
- Arthur Hiller
- 1979-09-12
May 23, 2003 · The In-Laws: Directed by Andrew Fleming. With Michael Douglas, Michael Bodnar, Vladimir Radian, Robin Tunney. Right before his daughter's wedding, a mild-mannered foot doctor discovers that his future son-in-law's father is a free-wheeling international spy.
- (18K)
- Action, Comedy, Thriller
- Andrew Fleming
- 2003-05-23
Mild-mannered dentist Sheldon Kornpett (Alan Arkin) is uncomfortable with his daughter's marriage after meeting her future father-in-law, Vincent Ricardo (Peter Falk). Over dinner, Vince tells ...
- (29)
- Arthur Hiller
- PG
- Peter Falk
The In-Laws is a 2003 American action comedy film starring Michael Douglas, Albert Brooks, Robin Tunney, Ryan Reynolds and Candice Bergen. The film is a remake of the original 1979 cult classic of the same name. Scenes for the 2003 film were shot on location in Chicago. The film was a box office failure and received mixed to negative reviews.
The In-Laws (1979) cast and crew credits, including actors, actresses, directors, writers and more. Menu. Movies. Release Calendar Top 250 Movies Most Popular Movies ...
People also ask
Is 'the in-laws' a good movie?
Is 'the in-laws' a good comedy?
Where can I watch the in-laws?
Does Vince need Sheldon in 'the in-laws'?
May 23, 2003 · "The In-Laws" is an accomplished but not inspired remake of a 1979 comedy which was inspired and so did not need to be accomplished. The earlier movie was slapdash and at times seemed to be making itself up as it went along, but it had big laughs and a kind of lunacy. The remake knows the moves but lacks the recklessness.
