Sun Yat-sen
Search results
Dai Jitao or Tai Chi-t'ao ( Chinese: 戴季陶; pinyin: Dài Jìtáo; January 6, 1891 – February 21, 1949) was a Chinese journalist, an early Kuomintang member, and the first head of the Examination Yuan of the Republic of China.
Mar 24, 2023 · Dai Jitao outlines Japan’s advantages over China as follows: 1. “The truth of faith.” An “idea” becomes “faith” only when it is “merged with life.” “The idea of suicide,” which is unique to Japan, as shown in “seppuku” and “shinjū,” is one expression of the purity of this “faith.”
- Hideaki Sasaki
Mar 28, 2013 · Dai Jitao 戴季陶 (1891-1949), actual name ( ming) Dai Chuanxian 戴傳賢, style Tianchou 天仇 or Li Yuan 孝園, was a philosopher and politician of the first half of the 20th century, and the main theoretician of the Nationalist Party Kuomintang 國民黨 (KMT). His family hailed from Wuxing 吳興 (modern Huzhou 湖州, Zhejiang), but ...
Mar 24, 2023 · PDF | Dai Jitao is often referred to as Dai Chuanxian or by his pseudonyms, Dai Xuantang or Dai Jitao. As a journalist, his pen name was Dai Tianchou.... | Find, read and cite all the...
- Hideaki Sasaki
Dec 15, 2017 · As Sun’s close follower and translator Dai Jitao (1890–1949) explained, 83 Sun had felt warmly welcomed by the Japanese in 1913, not only because of his eminent status but also because he openly expressed the political wish that many of his Japanese hosts also harboured: ever closer Sino-Japanese cooperation.
- Torsten Weber
- 2018
Nov 8, 2019 · 14 Dai Jitao, “Wo he yige pengyou de tanhua” (My Conversations with a friend), Xingqi pinglun (Weekly Review), no. 17 (1919): 4. 15 Liang Shuming, “Zhongguo wenhua yaoyi” (The Essentials of Chinese Culture) (1949), Liang Shuming quanji (Complete works of Liang Shuming), vol. 3 (Jinan, China: Shandong renmin chubanshe, 1990), 225.
People also ask
Who was Dai Jitao?
How did Dai Jitao die?
What is Dai Jitao Zhuyi?
Was Dai Jitao a realist?
The Buddhist Nationalism of Dai Jitao 戴季陶. “To choose Buddhism in the search for religious identity meant that one was choosing to be Chinese. It was an expression of cultural loyalism, a denial that things Chinese were inferior.”. Holmes Welch, The Revival of Chinese Buddhism, 261.
