Marlee Matlin
Assistand DA Tess Kaufman
Search results
News about Donald Trump, Hunter Biden, Lisa Rinna
News about Randy Zelin, Jake Tapper, reasonable doubt
Also in the news
Cast
Episode Guide
- 1. Pilot Sep 26, 1991
- A top-flight DA and a stubborn police detective combat injustice in Chicago.
- 2. Hard Bargains Sep 27, 1991
- Dicky and Tess clash over her approach to helping a disturbed assault suspect.
- 3. Making Dirt Stick Oct 4, 1991
- Tess accuses Dicky of overaggressiveness in pursuing a murder witness.
Reasonable Doubts: Created by Robert Singer. With Mark Harmon, Marlee Matlin, William Converse-Roberts, Tim Grimm. A drama about the working relationship between Assistant DA Tess Kaufman, a prosecutor sensitive to the rights of the accused, and hard-charging, gruff Detective Dicky Cobb, an old-fashioned cop with a "bust-the-perps" attitude.
- (499)
- 1991-09-26
- Crime, Drama
- 60
Network. NBC. Release. September 26, 1991. ( 1991-09-26) –. April 27, 1993. ( 1993-04-27) Reasonable Doubts is an American police drama television series created by Robert Singer, which broadcast in the United States by NBC that ran from September 26, 1991, to April 27, 1993.
- What Is Reasonable Doubt?
- Understanding Reasonable Doubt
- Difference Between Belief and Certainty
- Unreasonable Doubt
- Exculpatory Evidence
- Other Standards of Proof
- Presumption of Innocence
- The Bottom Line
Reasonable doubt is legal terminology referring to insufficient evidence that prevents a judge or jury from convicting a defendant of a crime. It is the traditional standard of proof that must be exceeded to secure a guilty verdict in a criminal case in a court of law. In a criminal case, it is the job of the prosecution to convince the jury that t...
Under U.S. law, a defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty. Reasonable doubt stems from insufficient evidence. If it cannot be proved without a doubt that the defendant is guilty, that person should not be convicted. Verdicts do not necessarily reflect the truth, they reflect the evidence presented. A defendant’s actual innocence or gui...
It isn't unusual for a juror to believe that the defendant is a criminal but not be convinced with certainty that they committed the particular crime they are charged with. That isn't good enough to find the defendant guilty. Reasonable doubt comes from certainty rather than belief. Belief and instinct are important in many instances in life but ca...
The reasonable doubt standard forces jurors to ignore doubts considered unreasonable when determining if a defendant is guilty. Unreasonable doubt, which often stems from the possibility that nonexistent or unpresented evidence might explain a defendant's actions and lead to exoneration, is not enough to acquit the defendant.
Evidence favorable to the defendant in a criminal trial can also create reasonable doubt as to whether the accused committed the crime. The defendant's team should not be viewed with more skepticism than the prosecutor's team. Each shred of evidence should be given the same consideration. This is important as any reasonable doubt, however small, th...
Other commonly used standards of proof in criminal cases are: 1. Probable Cause: A requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that the police have more than just suspicionthat a suspect committed a crime before making an arrest, conducting a search, or serving a warrant. 2. Reasonable Belief and Reasonable Suspicion: A reasonable presumption by a po...
The criminal justice system seeks to unearth the truth, convict the guilty, and let the innocent walk free. In order for this to work, each juror must walk into the courtroom presuming the accused is innocent. This presumption requires that jurors have a skeptical mindset that must be overcome before they can reach a guilty verdict. The jurors must...
Reasonable doubt is an important legal standard that strives to prevent innocent people from getting convicted for a crime they didn’t commit. If it cannot be proved without a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty, then they should not be convicted of the crime as charged.
- Daniel Liberto
A reasonable doubt is not a doubt based upon sympathy or prejudice and, instead, is based on reason and common sense. Reasonable doubt is logically connected to the evidence or absence of evidence. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not involve proof to an absolute certainty.
Season 1 – Reasonable Doubts. A hearing impaired assistant D.A. works on felony cases.
- (8)
- September 26, 1991
NBC. Drama. Watchlist. A deaf ADA teams with a tough cop, whose understanding of sign language helps her prosecute criminals. Streaming. Airings. Currently not available to stream. Add it to your...
May 24, 2018 · When NBC’s cop drama Reasonable Doubts premiered in 1991, the world was introduced to deaf Assistant District Attorney Tess Kaufman (a young Marlee Matlin) and American Sign Language-fluent...
