Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Dec 1, 2014 · Defense leaders are concerned first and foremost with preparing, deploying, and sustaining forces to deliver operational effect. Change programs in defense that start with operational effectiveness create stronger engagement and are more likely to succeed than those focused primarily on cost reduction.

  2. 2 days ago · Change advocates, including Hendrix and Brose, told me that the iron triangle that supports legacy systems — which Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) described as the “defense-industrial-congressional ...

  3. Change programs in defense that start with operational efectiveness create stronger engagement and are more likely to succeed than those focused primarily on cost reduction. The United Kingdom’s work on end-to-end logistics serves as a good example.

    • 149KB
    • 5
  4. Feb 27, 2024 · Here are the winners and losers in US Army’s force structure change. By Jen Judson. Tuesday, Feb 27, 2024. A prototype Maneuver Short-Range Air Defense Stryker is positioned at the edge of a ...

  5. Jan 1, 2001 · More importantly, answering it is crucial for making appropriate changes in U.S. and allied weaponry, military operations, wartime preparations, and defense budget priorities.

  6. Jun 15, 2021 · RAND research on military transformation—the adjustment of a nation's military to achieve a specified objective—analyzes four major issues: force structure, modernization, readiness, and sustainability.

  7. People also ask

  8. May 15, 2021 · Technological change of relevance to military innovation may be faster and more consequential in the next 20 years than it has proven over the last 20 — and this sense of possibility is being ...

  1. Searches related to A Change in Defense

    trial & error a change in defense