Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.oyez.org › cases › 2016Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California | Oyez

   www.oyez.org › cases › 2016

   Apr 25, 2017 · Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Respondent. Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco. Location. San Francisco, CA. Docket no. 16-466. Decided by. Roberts Court. Lower court. Supreme Court of California. Citation. 582 US _ (2017) Granted. Jan 19, 2017. Argued. Apr 25, 2017. Decided. Jun 19, 2017. Advocates.

2. supreme.justia.com › cases › federalBristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California ...

   supreme.justia.com › cases › federal

   • Cached

   Decided: June 19, 2017. Justia Summary. Plaintiffs, most of whom are not California residents, sued BMS in California state court, alleging that the pharmaceutical company’s drug Plavix had damaged their health. BMS is incorporated in Delaware and headquartered in New York; it maintains substantial operations in New York and New Jersey.

3. People also ask

   Who is suing Bristol-Myers Squibb Company?

   • More than 600 plaintiffs, most of whom are not California residents, filed this civil action in a California state court against Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS), asserting a variety of state-law claims based on injuries allegedly caused by a BMS drug called Plavix.

   Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, 582 U.S

   supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/582/16-466/

   See all results for this question

   Who is the amicus curiae in Bristol–Myers Squibb Company v Superior Court?

   • BRISTOL–MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, Petitioner v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY, et al. Neal Katyal, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Rachel P. Kovner, for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, supporting the petitioner. Thomas C. Goldstein, Bethesda, MD, for Respondents.

   Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal. - Casetext

   casetext.com/case/bristol-myers-squibb-co-v-superior-court-of-cal

   See all results for this question

   Does California have jurisdiction over Bristol-Myers?

   • The Court held that California state courts did not have jurisdiction over Bristol-Myers with respect to the non-residents' claims. Specific jurisdiction may exist only where the events underlying the lawsuit arise out of or relate to the defendant's contact with the forum state.

   Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol-Myers_Squibb_Co._v._Superior_Court

   See all results for this question

   Can Bristol-Myers be sued in California?

   • So respondents could not, for instance, hale Bristol-Myers into court in Califor- nia for negligently maintaining the sidewalk outside its New York headquarters—a claim that has no connection to acts Bristol-Myers took in California. But respondents’ claims against Bristol-Myers look nothing like such a claim.

   SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

   www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/16-466_1qm1.pdf

   See all results for this question

4. www.supremecourt.gov › opinions › 16pdfSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

   www.supremecourt.gov › opinions › 16pdf

   BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA . No. 16–466. Argued April 25, 2017—Decided June 19, 2017 . A group of plaintiffs, most of whom are not California residents, sued Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS) in California state court, al-leging that ...

   • File Size: 147KB

   • Page Count: 26

5. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Bristol-Myers_Squibb_CoBristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Bristol-Myers_Squibb_Co

   • Cached

   Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that California courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant on claims brought by plaintiffs who are not California residents and did not suffer their alleged injury in ...

6. Videos

   • 

     1:52

     youtube.com

     Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of CA (2017) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary

     Jun 3, 2023

     295 Views

   • 

     quimbee.com

     Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court, 137 S. Ct. 1773 (2017): Case Brief Summary

     Nov 1, 2018

     0 Views

   • 

     2:40

     youtube.com

     Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal. (2017) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary

     Aug 25, 2023

     244 Views

   View all

7. casetext.com › case › bristol-myers-squibb-co-vBristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal. - Casetext

   casetext.com › case › bristol-myers-squibb-co-v

   • Cached

   Jun 19, 2017 · More than 600 plaintiffs, most of whom are not California residents, filed this civil action in a California state court against Bristol–Myers Squibb Company (BMS), asserting a variety of state-law claims based on injuries allegedly caused by a BMS drug called Plavix.

8. www.casebriefs.com › blog › lawBristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court - CaseBriefs

   www.casebriefs.com › blog › law

   • Cached

   Plaintiffs sued Defendant in California state court, alleging that the pharmaceutical company’s drug Plavix had damaged their health. The California Supreme Court dismissed the case, holding that the California court had no jurisdiction. Plaintiffs appealed. Synopsis of Rule of Law.

9. www.scotusblog.com › case-files › casesBristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San ...

   www.scotusblog.com › case-files › cases

   • Cached

   Apr 25, 2017 · Argument preview: Justices to consider challenge to California court’s jurisdiction over claims by out-of-state litigants against out-of-state defendants (Ronald Mann, April 18, 2017) Court adds two more cases to its merits docket (Amy Howe, January 19, 2017)