Search results
Apr 28, 2009 · Supreme Court of India. Bhushan Kumar Meen vs Mansi Meen @ Harpreet Kaur on 28 April, 2009. Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2009 SC 407. Bench: Cyriac Joseph, Altamas Kabir. 1. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 879 OF 2009.
- Facts
- Issue
- Ruling
- Analysis
The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patiala, is presiding over the proceedings under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, filed by the respondent wife. Considering the evidence presented, the Magistrate ordered the appellant husband to pay an interim maintenance amount of Rs 10,000 to the respondent wife during the pendency of ...
Whether the learned Magistrate should be directed to expedite the pending proceedings and dispose of the case within a specified timeframe?
The court, taking into account the prolonged duration of the case and the partial completion of evidence, hereby directs the learned Magistrate to conclude the pending proceedings within six months from the date of this order.
The order of attachment of the appellant's salary, which was temporarily suspended during these proceedings, shall remain in effect until the final disposal of the case by the learned Magistrate.
May 10, 2022 · Bhushan Kumar Meen Vs Mansi Meen @ Harpreet Kaur on 28 April 2009, SC. May 10, 2022. Judgements / Maintainance. 0 Comments. May 10, 2022. Two Bench of Supreme court of India Set-aside the maintenance awarded to the respondent under Section 125 CrPC as the appellant-husband receiving a sum of about Rs.9000/- in hand after deduction of various ...
Jul 8, 2023 · Bhushan Kumar Meen v. Mansi Meen @ Harpreet Kaur (2009) stands as a landmark judgment, carving a niche in the annals of family law in India. The Supreme Court’s decision in this case signifies its unwavering commitment to safeguarding the institution of marriage while recognizing the inevitability of irretrievable breakdowns and the impact of ...
BHUSHAN KUMAR MEEN Appellant(s) VERSUS MANSI MEEN @ HARPREET KAUR Respondent(s) O R D E R The petitioner, who has filed this criminal misc. petition and has been appearing in person, is not present, when the matter is taken up. However, a criminal misc.
Sep 25, 2023 · In a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India modified the interim maintenance granted in the case of Bhushan Kumar Meen vs. Mansi Meen @ Harpreet Kaur. The appeal was directed against the Punjab & Haryana High Court’s judgment, which had upheld an interim maintenance order of Rs. 10,000 per month to the respondent-wife.
People also ask
What is Bhushan Kumar Meen V mansi Meen?
Who is presiding in Bhushan Kumar Meen V mansi Meen alias Harpreet Kaur?
What happened between Bhushan Kumar Meen & Mansi Meen at Harpreet Kaur?
Why did Mansi Meen invoke Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act?
Apr 28, 2009 · Bhushan Kumar Meen vs Mansi Meen Harpreet Kaur on 28 April 2009. DV spaecial no menetencene. Course. B.A.LL.B (Hons.) 157Documents. Students shared 157 documents in this course. University. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar National Law University. Academic year:2022/2023. Uploaded by: Prasenjeet Gaikwad. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar National Law University. 0followers.
