Search results
I have worked in the fields of evidence-based medicine, clinical investigation, clinical and molecular epidemiology, clinical research methodology, empirical research methods, statistics, and genomics.
Aug 30, 2005 · Published research findings are sometimes refuted by subsequent evidence, says Ioannidis, with ensuing confusion and disappointment.
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- 2005
"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" is a 2005 essay written by John Ioannidis, a professor at the Stanford School of Medicine, and published in PLOS Medicine. It is considered foundational to the field of metascience.
Oct 4, 2010 · John Ioannidis has spent his career challenging his peers by exposing their bad science. Much of what medical researchers conclude in their studies is misleading, exaggerated, or flat-out...
Ioannidis studies scientific research itself, meta-research primarily in clinical medicine and the social sciences. He has served on the editorial board of over twenty scientific journals including Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Journal of the National Cancer Institute (JNCI) and The Lancet .
Professor of Medicine/Health Research & Policy/Biomedical Data Science/Statistics, Stanford Univ - Cited by 558,920 - meta-research - clinical epidemiology - evidence-based medicine - research methods - meta-analysis
People also ask
How did Ioannidis contribute to genetic epidemiology?
Is Ioannidis the most influential scientist alive?
Did Ioannidis give scientists a chance to cluck about wrongness?
Related searches
