Search results
Oct 27, 2020 · On October 27, 2020, Graham, Michelle et al. filed a General Torts - (Torts) case against Starbucks Corporation, A Washington Corporation in the jurisdiction of San Joaquin County, CA. This case was filed in San Joaquin County Superior Courts, with Abdallah, George J. presiding.
Oct 27, 2020 · On 10/27/2020 Michelle Graham filed a Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury lawsuit against Starbucks Corporation, a Washington Corporation. This case was filed in San Joaquin County Superior Courts, Stockton Courthouse located in San Joaquin, California. The Judge overseeing this case is Abdallah, George J..
Apr 23, 2024 · On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments — not about whether Starbucks illegally interfered with the union drive, but about whether a lower court erred in ordering Starbucks to...
Aug 13, 2023 · Full title: M.H., Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, Defendant. Court: United States District Court, S.D. New York. Date published: Aug 13, 2023
People also ask
Will the Supreme Court hear a Starbucks barista case?
Could a Supreme Court case impact Starbucks unionization?
Why did the Supreme Court support Starbucks?
What if the Supreme Court rules in favor of Starbucks?
Apr 11, 2024 · That’s the central question that the Supreme Court will consider on April 23, 2024, during oral arguments in the Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney case. The global coffee shop chain is challenging the...
22-5730 M McKinney v Starbucks Corporation: Play: Save: ... 21-3975 Graham et al v Peltz et al: Play: ... 21-3997 Michelle Snyder v Finley Co LPA: Play:
Jan 24, 2018 · In ruling for Starbucks, Judge Gonzalez Rogers analyzed whether this common element was satisfied in any of the plaintiffs three theories of liability. Plaintiffs sought to prove the size of the cups Starbucks used for hot drinks (“Hot Cups”) exactly reflected the amount of drink she would receive;
