Ad
related to: peter singer famine affluence and morality conclusionBrowse & Discover Thousands of Book Titles, for Less.
Search results
- Singer argues that most of us in affluent societies are making a terrible moral mistake. When we look at distant suffering—such as results from global poverty, famine, or disease—we tend to think that helping is morally optional, or what philosophers call “ supererogatory ”.
www.utilitarianism.net › peter-singer-famine-affluence-and-moralityStudy Guide: Peter Singer's 'Famine, Affluence, and Morality'
People also ask
What is Famine Affluence and morality?
What pitfalls should you avoid when writing on singer's 'Famine Affluence and morality'?
Who wrote Famine Affluence and morality?
Are there better alternatives to famine and affluence?
Peter Singer’s ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’ 1 is widely regarded as one of the most important and influential texts in applied ethics. This study guide explains Singer’s central argument, explores possible objections, and clarifies common misunderstandings.
Peter Singer "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" is an essay written by Peter Singer in 1971 and published in Philosophy & Public Affairs in 1972. It argues that affluent persons are morally obligated to donate far more resources to humanitarian causes than is considered normal in Western cultures.
- Peter Singer
- 2015
PETER SINGER Famine, Affluence, and Morality As I write this, in November Ig7I, people are dying in East Bengal from lack of food, shelter, and medical care. The suffering and death that are occurring there now are not inevitable, not unavoidable in any fatalistic sense of the term. Constant poverty, a cyclone, and a
Summary: “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”. The essay “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” was first published by Peter Singer in 1972 in the journal Philosophy and Public Affairs. Singer had just completed his graduate studies at Oxford University, and was responding to weather- and war-related crises in Bangladesh that resulted in a ...
Peter Singer's Famine Affluence and Morality is undoubtedly one of the most influential and widely read pieces of contemporary philosophy. Yet, the ma jority of philosophers (including ethicists) reject Singer's conclusion that we are morally required to donate to aid agencies whenever we can do so with
Abstract. As I write this, in November 1971, people are dying in East Bengal from lack of food, shelter, and medical caxc. The suffering and death that are occurring there now axe not inevitable, 1101; unavoidable in any fatalistic sense of the term.
In 1972, the young philosopher Peter Singer published "Famine, Affluence and Morality," which rapidly became one of the most widely discussed essays in applied ethics. Through this article, Singer presents his ...
