Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Jan 19, 2016 · gas exponent for modified Brooks-Corey functions n o = oil exponent for modified Brooks-Corey functions n w = water exponent for modified Brooks-Corey functions N = number of laminations N c = capillary number P c = capillary pressure, m/Lt 2, psi P cgo = capillary pressure between gas and oil phases, m/Lt 2, psi P cow =

  2. n pg = exponent of the capillary pressure curve in gas-oil system (p c ) S lc = capillary pressure at critical liquid saturation. The exponents and coefficients of Equations 5-22 through 5-26 are usually determined by the least-squares method to match the experimental or field relative permeability and capillary pressure data.

  3. People also ask

  4. Jan 1, 2015 · Gas–Oil Systems. A Corey-type approach can also be used to characterise gas–oil curves. Relative permeability to oil can be expressed as: k r o k r o ′ = kron = Son No and gas relative permeability by: k r g = S g n N g, where krg is referenced to Ko′ at Swir.

  5. The Corey equations for relative gas and oil permeability and the gas-oil relative permeability ratio are: SL − SLR 2 SL − SLR 2krg = 1 − 1 − Sm − SLR 1 − SLR. (1) SL − SLR 4kro = 1 − SLR. (2) SL − SLR 2 SL − SLR 21 − 1 − krg Sm − SLR 1 − SLR=kro SL − SLR 4 1 − SLR. (3)

    • Carl E. Johnson
    • 1968
  6. 3.2. Coreys model Corey proposed a simple mathematical expression for generating relative-permeability data of a gas-oil system [10, 15]. After replacing oil by water in Coreys model, the gas/water relative permeability ratio will be: * 4 * 3 * (1) ( 2) g g g rw rg S S K K − − = (4) where wc g g S S S − = 1 *, and S g is gas ...

  7. Corey Expressions Relative permeabilities are strongly dependent on formation and fluid properties and should therefore ideally be determined from laboratory experiments, in particular from coreflooding tests.

  8. Apr 4, 2017 · Experimental and simulated relative permeability curves of the water phase derived from \(T_1\) distributions show a good match of corresponding Corey fit exponents, \(n_\mathrm{w}\): 4.6 versus 4.9–5.0 for Bentheimer; 4.8 versus 4.9–5.0 for Castlegate and 5.3 versus 5.3–6.5 for Leopard.

  1. People also search for