Search results
Tiglath-Pileser III (từ thể tiếng Do Thái của tiếng Akkad: Tukultī-apil-Ešarra, "niềm tin của là trong đức con của Esharra") là một vị vua lỗi lạc của Assyria ở thế kỷ 8 trước Công nguyên (trị vì từ năm 745–727 trước Công nguyên) được công nhận rộng rãi là người sáng lập ...
Tiglath-Pileser III (Neo-Assyrian Akkadian: 𒆪𒋾𒀀𒂍𒈗𒊏, romanized: Tukultī-apil-Ešarra, meaning "my trust belongs to the son of Ešarra"; Biblical Hebrew: תִּגְלַת פִּלְאֶסֶר , romanized: Tīglaṯ Pīlʾeser) was the king of the Neo-Assyrian Empire from 745 BC to his death in 727.
People also ask
Who was Tiglath-Pileser III?
When did the royal inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III & Shalmaneser V end?
How many inscriptions did Tiglath-Pileser III have?
Did Pul (Pulu) and Tiglath-Pileser III have the same king?
Nov 8, 2019 · November 8, 2019 Bryan Windle. Tiglath-Pileser III: An Archaeological Biography. One of the greatest Assyrian kings is the subject of our next bioarchaeography: Tiglath-Pileser III. The Incirli Stele is an ancient boundary stone with a Phoenician inscription that dates to the 8th century BC.
Jun 30, 2011 · Contents. About this book. The Royal Inscriptions of Tiglath-pileser III (744–727 BC) and Shalmaneser V (726–722 BC), Kings of Assyria (Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period 1) carries on where the Assyrian Periods sub-series of the Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia (RIM) Project ended.
Tiglath-pileser III (reigned 745-727 B.C.), king of Assyria, was an able warrior and administrator who laid the foundations of the Late Assyrian Empire. Tiglath-pileser or in Assyrian, Tukulti-apal-Eshara, was almost certainly an adopted name chosen in emulation of an earlier warrior-king.
The corpus of inscriptions firmly identifiable to Tiglath-pileser III currently comprised 34 to 35 texts.2They are found on a variety of objects made of stone, clay, and metal, and shaped in various forms, i.e., slabs, a stele, a statue, a rock relief, tablets, bulls, bricks, duck or lion weights, a bead, etc.
As Grayson goes on to discuss, the most likely resolutions of this contradiction are either that the scribe of the king list witness made an error, meaning to write Adad-Nirari instead of Ashur-Nirari, the latter being the elder brother of Tiglath-Pileser, or the scribe of the brick inscription purposefully wrote Adad-Nirari when in fact he was ...
