Search results
While the Federalists argued for a stronger national government, the Anti-Federalists defended a vision of America rooted in powerful states. The Anti-Federalists feared that the new Constitution gave the new national government too much power.
Antifederalists, as they came to be called, were the voices warning of tyranny and a new monarchy if too much power was vested in a national body. Though agreeing the Articles needed visions, they preferred the confederation model of vesting most legislative powers within the individual states.
The men who opposed the Constitution's unconditional ratification in 1787–1788 were called Anti-Federalists, although they claimed to be the true federalists and the true republicans. Contrary to common opinion, their major contribution to the American founding lies more in their critical examination of the new form of federalism and the new ...
Jul 13, 2018 · “Anti-Federalist” describes the philosophical and political position of individuals who, during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and the subsequent state ratification debates (1787–89), generally opposed the constitution proposed to replace the Articles of Confederation.
There are three kinds of Antifederalists, but each voice is an important one in the creation and adoption of the Constitution and the subsequent unfolding of American politics. The first kind is represented by politicians such as Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut.
“Anti-Federalist” describes the philosophical and political position of individuals who, during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and the subsequent state ratification debates (1787–89), generally opposed the constitution proposed to replace the Articles of Confederation.
People also ask
What does Anti-Federalist mean?
What was the difference between federalism and Anti-Federalists?
Who were the Antifederalists and what did they do?
Why did the Anti-federalists oppose federalism?
Anti-Federalists were concerned that the Constitution would create too strong of a central government and they wanted to limit the power of the federal government. For example, they argued that Congress should have only six years to decide what to do with any money it collects in taxes.
