Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. The Lawphil Project. Click on the year to read the full text of the decision.

  2. The court found that the respondent was guilty of violating Canon 13, Rule Case 13.02, and Canon 11 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, Section 3, 7 and 8 of Canon 1, Sections 1 and 2 of Canon 2.

  3. The Lawphil Project - Year 2020 Supreme Court Decisions We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on Lawphil.net. By continuing to browse our site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

  4. In order to sustain a conviction for violation of Section 7 (d) of RA 6713, the following elements must be proved with moral certainty: (a) that the accused is a public official or employee; (b) that the accused solicited or accepted any loan or anything of monetary value from any person; and (c) that the said act was done in the course of the ...

  5. The Lawphil Project - Year 2019 Supreme Court Decisions

  6. JANUARY 2019 - PHILIPPINE JURISPRUDENCE. CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE; G.R. No. 217978 January 30, 2019: ... The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation, Inc. ...

  7. The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation, Inc. (2) - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free.

  1. People also search for