Search results
Dec 1, 2023 · This book offers an accessible overview of the issues related to the Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) global agenda. This new edition has been updated and includes new chapters on WPS and Environmental Change and on WPS in Regional and Security Organizations.
- 2nd Edition
Apr 3, 2019 · This article purportedly seeks to examine some of the varied issues of conflict, peace and security and the challenges posed before the IR theorists to deal with them. It will also examine how the liberals, realists, Marxists, neo-Marxists and functionalists interpret conflict-transformation, peace-building and security.
- Sujit Lahiry
- 2019
Several alternative approaches to international relations have challenged the basic realist account of the security problem, three of which are democratic peace theory, economic liberalism, and social constructivism.
Dec 6, 2017 · Rather than address base politics per se, I use the Jeju anti-base episode to think critically about existing notions of peace, security, and power (or what I refer to as the politics of peace and security) where state and societal actors have clashed over the presence of military bases.
- Andrew I. Yeo
- 2018
Feb 8, 2021 · Chapter. Get access. Cite. Summary. The most fundamental questions in international relations are: “Why do states go to war?” “How can interstate conflict be prevented or ameliorated?,” and “What are the pathways to greater international cooperation?”
- William J. Long
- 2021
Jul 21, 2022 · In his book “Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace,” Hans J. Morgenthau identified six principles of political realism: Politics, like society, is governed by objective laws rooted in human nature; International politics are shaped by a state’s interests, especially in terms of power;
People also ask
Do peace activists reject state security policies?
What does Gangjeong say about peace?
How did international peace groups help the Jeju anti-base movement?
What if security were not a problem?
Apr 11, 2007 · The author discusses how the current violent events may be in part a consequence of behaviors of the U.S. government and other governmental and nongovernmental organizations that are contrary to the major developments that contribute to global peace and cooperation.
