Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2011G.R. No. 171947-48 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2011

   • Cached

   3 Our Decision in Metropolitan Manila Development Authority v. Concerned Residents of Manila Bay, G.R. Nos. 171947-48, December 18, 2008, 574 SCRA 661, 690, states: "RA 9003 took effect on February 15, 2001 and the adverted grace period of five (5) years [in Sec. 37 of RA 9003] which ended on February 21, 2006 has come and gone, but no single ...

   • G.R. Nos. 171947-48 - The Lawphil Project

     supreme court manila. en banc. g.r. nos. 171947-48 december...

   • G.R. No. 171947-48 - METROPOLITAN MANILA DEVELOPMENT ...

     Thus, Akbayan additionally:/ prays that the Manila Bay...

2. www.projectjurisprudence.com › 2018 › 06Case Digest: MMDA v. Concerned Residents of Manila Bay

   www.projectjurisprudence.com › 2018 › 06

   • Cached

   Concerned Residents of Manila Bay. Case Digest: MMDA v. Concerned Residents of Manila Bay. G.R. No. 171947 : February 15, 2011. METROPOLITAN MANILA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CULTURE AND SPORTS, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND ...

3. dev2.pinayjurist.com › mmda-v-concerned-residents-ofMMDA v. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY G.R. Nos. 171947-48 ...

   dev2.pinayjurist.com › mmda-v-concerned-residents-of

   • Cached

   Dec 18, 2008 · The RTC Ordered Petitioners to Clean Up and Rehabilitate Manila Bay. The DENR, DPWH, Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA), Philippine Coast Guard , PNP Maritime Group, and five other executive departments and agencies filed directly with this Court a petition for review under Rule 45.

4. lawyerly.ph › juris › viewMMDA v. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY - Lawyerly

   lawyerly.ph › juris › view

   • Cached

   Feb 15, 2011 · Former DENR Undersecretary. Dean of the Ateneo School of Government. [3] Our Decision in Metropolitan Manila Development Authority v. Concerned Residents of Manila Bay, G.R. Nos. 171947-48, December 18, 2008, 574 SCRA 661, 690, states: " RA 9003 took effect on February 15, 2001 and the adverted grace period of five (5) years [in Sec. 37 of RA ...

5. sc.judiciary.gov.ph › supreme-court-to-hear-oralSupreme Court to Hear Oral Arguments on Manila Bay Pollution ...

   sc.judiciary.gov.ph › supreme-court-to-hear-oral

   • Cached

   Aug 30, 2023 · The Supreme Court Public Information Office shall upload a copy of the August 29, 2023 Resolution in G.R. No. 171947-48 (Metropolitan Manila Development Authority, et al. [petitioners] v. Concerned Residents of Manila Bay, et al. [respondents and Akbayan Citizen’s Action Party [intervenor]) once it receives a copy of the same from the Office ...

6. People also ask

   What happened in MMDA V Manila Bay?

   • MMDA v. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY G.R. Nos. 171947-48 December 18, 2008 Mandamus FACTS: Respondents Concerned Residents of Manila Bay filed a complaint before the RTC in Imus, Cavite against several government agencies, among them the petitioners, for the cleanup, rehabilitation, and protection of the Manila Bay.

   MMDA v. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY G.R. Nos. 171947-4…

   dev2.pinayjurist.com/mmda-v-concerned-residents-of-manila-bay-g-r-nos-171947-48-december-18-2008-mandamus/

   See all results for this question

   What did the court say about rehabilitate and rehabilitate Manila Bay?

   • On December 18, 2008, this Court rendered a Decision in G.R. Nos. 171947-48 ordering petitioners to clean up, rehabilitate and preserve Manila Bay in their different capacities. The fallo reads: WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED.

   G.R. No. 171947-48 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2011/feb2011/gr_171947_2011.html

   See all results for this question

   Did the Manila Bay Advisory Committee resist a court writ?

   • It noted that the Department has in fact submitted its report to the Manila Bay Advisory Committee, listing various government activities made thus far for the Manila Bay.21 Likewise, it did not find that the Department resisted or disobeyed lawful processes or orders of this Court, as mandated in the writ.22

   G.R. No. 171947-48 - METROPOLITAN MANILA DEVELOPMENT AUTHO…

   lawphil.net/sc_res/reso2020/nob2020/pdf/gr_171947-48_leonen.pdf

   See all results for this question

   When did the Supreme Court rehabilitate Manila Bay?

   • In 2008, the Supreme Court ordered the concerned government agencies to clean up, rehabilitate, and preserve Manila Bay. In 2011, the Supreme Court ordered the party government agencies to execute directives in order to implement the 2008 Decision.

   Supreme Court to Hear Oral Arguments on Manila Bay Pollution Case

   sc.judiciary.gov.ph/supreme-court-to-hear-oral-arguments-on-manila-bay-pollution-case/

   See all results for this question