Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPLMozilla Public License, version 2.0

   www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPL

   • Cached

   1.12. “Secondary License” means either the GNU General Public License, Version 2.0, the GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1, the GNU Affero General Public License, Version 3.0, or any later versions of those licenses. 1.13. “Source Code Form” means the form of the work preferred for making modifications. 1.14. “You” (or ...

2. www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPLMozilla Public Licence — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPL

   • Cached

   The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 (html | plain text). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ. MPL 2.0 Revision Process. The release of MPL 2.0 was the result of a two year process that revised MPL 1.1.

3. People also ask

   What is the Mozilla Public License?

   • Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source / free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 ( html | plain text ). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ.

   Mozilla Public Licence — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/

   See all results for this question

   Does the Mozilla Foundation have an open source license?

   • It’s therefore no surprise that the Mozilla Foundation has created its own open source license, the Mozilla Public License. Version 1.0 of the Mozilla Public License (MPL) was released in 1998, with a slightly modified Version 1.1 introduced the following year.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-mozilla-public-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

   What is the difference between MPL & Mozilla Public License?

   • MPL 2.0 works particularly well for programs that can use proprietary plug-ins (like some plug-ins to the Firefox browser). Mozilla Public License 2.0 contains an express patent license, but also some terms to clarify the scope of the license. It contains a disclaimer of implied licenses and also a strong defensive termination provision.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-mozilla-public-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

   What is the difference between Mozilla Public License V1 and V2?

   • They are not intended as a full description of its features. In comparison with the Mozilla Public License v1.1, the Mozilla Public License v2: OSS Watch has produced a document that highlights the main legal issues to consider when making your code available under an open source licence.

   The Mozilla Public Licence version 2 - An Overview - OSS Watch

   oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/mpl2

   See all results for this question

4. fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101

   • Cached

   Version 1.0 of the Mozilla Public License (MPL) was released in 1998, with a slightly modified Version 1.1 introduced the following year. Over a decade later, in 2010, Mozilla Public License 2.0 made its debut, and has remained the MPL of choice ever since.

5. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mozilla_Public_LicenseMozilla Public License - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mozilla_Public_License

   • Cached

   Both versions 1.0 and 1.1 are incompatible with the GPL, which led the Free Software Foundation to discourage using version 1.1. For these reasons, earlier versions of Firefox were released under multiple licenses: the MPL 1.1, GPL 2.0, and LGPL 2.1. [26]

6. oss-watch.ac.uk › resources › mpl2The Mozilla Public Licence version 2 - An Overview - OSS Watch

   oss-watch.ac.uk › resources › mpl2

   • Cached

   On 3rd January 2012, version 2 of the Mozilla Public License (MPL) was approved by the Open Source Initiative. It is also considered to be a Free Software licence by the Free Software Foundation. Like its predecessor, the Mozilla Public License v 1.1, it seeks to impose a moderate level of ‘copyleft’ restriction on adaptations of code that ...

7. opensource.stackexchange.com › questions › 8831licensing - Pros and Cons of using MPL-2.0 license? - Open ...

   opensource.stackexchange.com › questions › 8831

   • Cached

   The MPL license is a copyleft license, which means that in principle people are not allowed to distribute code that is under the MPL-2.0 license under different terms. The GPL licenses (including LGPL and AGPL) require that the entire application is distributed under the terms of the GPL license.