Emayatzy Corinealdi
Jax Stewart
Search results
Cast
Episode Guide
- 9. Already Home Nov 15, 2022
- Jax is kidnapped; she must figure out her future as a new case close to home comes to light.
- 8. Song Cry Nov 8, 2022
- The defense rests in Brayden's case as Jax has a revelation about the case.
- 7. N... What, N... Who Nov 1, 2022
- Lewis juggles single parenthood and the separation; the prosecution rests on Brayden's case.
The meaning of REASONABLE DOUBT is a doubt especially about the guilt of a criminal defendant that arises or remains upon fair and thorough consideration of the evidence or lack thereof. How to use reasonable doubt in a sentence.
A reasonable doubt is not a doubt based upon sympathy or prejudice and, instead, is based on reason and common sense. Reasonable doubt is logically connected to the evidence or absence of evidence. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not involve proof to an absolute certainty.
Apr 30, 2024 · What Is Reasonable Doubt? Reasonable doubt is legal terminology referring to insufficient evidence that prevents a judge or jury from convicting a defendant of a crime....
reasonable doubt - The level of certainty a juror must have to find a defendant guilty of a crime, which is such that a reasonable person would have, under the circumstances presented.
Although a criminal conviction is generally established by a jury using the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard, sentencing factors are generally evaluated by a judge using few evidentiary rules and under the more lenient “preponderance of the evidence” standard.
A standard of proof that must be surpassed to convict an accused in a criminal proceeding. Reasonable doubt is a standard of proof used in criminal trials. When a criminal defendant is prosecuted, the prosecutor must prove the defendant's guilt Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.
- www.nolo.com
- › …
- › Burden of Proof
"Beyond a reasonable doubt" is the highest legal standard. This is the standard the U.S. Constitution requires the government to meet in order to prove a defendant guilty of a crime. ( In re Winship , 397 U.S. 358, 364 (1970).)
The reasonable doubt standard plays a vital role in the American scheme of criminal procedure. It is a prime instrument for reducing the risk of convictions resting on factual error.
The reasonable doubt standard, originally and now, serves to minimize the chances that an innocent person will be convicted, but the reason for striving to avoid that outcome has been the subject of dispute.
Sufficient doubt on the part of jurors for acquittal of a defendant based on a lack of evidence.
