Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. Top results related to what is a mozilla public license 1 1 commercial use permit

   • Can I use Mozilla Public License 1.1 (MPL) in a commercial app?

     Top Answer

     Answered Jan 15, 2010 · 14 votes

     In a more serious tone, you should always consult to your lawyer, but it could be helpful if you read the annotated MPL 1.1 at: http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1-annotated.html but it basically means that the files can be combined with proprietary files on a "larger work", still, it would be wise if you read the annotated version and consult it with a lawyer.

     I'm not sure about if you have doubts about Apache license since you mention it on the question topic but not in the body of your question.

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     1/5

   • what is use of "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0" string in curl

     Top Answer

     Answered Jun 14, 2011 · 1 votes

     Its not cURL, its HTTP, that allows a header User-Agent, that describes the user agent of the client.

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     2/5

   • What does using a project that has the "reciprocal public license 1.5" mean I have to do with my code?

     Top Answer

     Answered Apr 14, 2011 · 10 votes

     For a commercial software RPL is even worse than GPL.

     It is true that you have to publish your source code on any derivative work.

     Also in GNU web site it says:

     The Reciprocal Public License is a non-free license because of three problems. 1. It puts limits on prices charged for an initial copy. 2. It requires notification of the original developer for publication of a modified version. 3. It requires publication of any modified version that an organization uses, even privately.

     source

     Edit

     Quatation from RPL 1.5:

     6.0 Your Obligations And Grants. In consideration of, and as an express condition to, the licenses granted to You under this License You hereby agree that any Modifications, Derivative Works, or Required Components (collectively Extensions) that You create or to which You contribute are governed by the terms of this License including, without limitation, Section 4. Any Extensions that You create or to which You contribute must be Deployed under the terms of this License or a future version of this License released under Section 7. You hereby grant to Licensor and all third parties a world-wide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license under those intellectual property rights You own or control to use, reproduce, display, perform, modify, create derivatives, sublicense, and distribute Licensed Software, in any form. Any Extensions You make and Deploy must have a distinct title so as to readily tell any subsequent user or Contributor that the Extensions are by You. You must include a copy of this License or directions on how to obtain a copy with every copy of the Extensions You distribute. You agree not to offer or impose any terms on any Source Code or executable version of the Licensed Software, or its Extensions that alter or restrict the applicable version of this License or the recipients' rights hereunder.

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     3/5

   • what is the need to use return 1 or -1 in the end of a function?

     Top Answer

     Answered Jul 28, 2020 · 1 votes

     return in a function is a way to see the outcome of that function when you call it later in your code.

     for example:

     def func(number): if number % 2 == 0: return 1 else: return -1def func2(value): if value == 1: print('The provided number is even') elif value == -1: print('The provided number is odd')value = func(6)func2(value)

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     4/5

   • What is the use of Identify (1,1) in synapse sql pool?

     Top Answer

     Answered Feb 15, 2021 · 0 votes

     The purpose of using an identity column in Synapse is to create a unique key for each row while consuming a minimal amount of resources. This assumes you don't turn use SET IDENTITY_INSERT ON or reset the seed to override the default behavior. For the values to be unique, there is no requirement for a specific starting point or increment value. Including the (<seed>, <increment>)values in the command keeps the syntax consistent with SQL Server and Azure SQL.

     Check all answers on Stack Overflow

     5/5

   Show moreShow less

2. www.mozilla.org › MPL › 1Mozilla Public License version 1.1

   www.mozilla.org › MPL › 1

   • Cached

   Mozilla Public License Version 1.1. 1. Definitions. 1.0.1. "Commercial Use". means distribution or otherwise making the Covered Code available to a third party. 1.1. "Contributor". means each entity that creates or contributes to the creation of Modifications.

3. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mozilla_Public_LicenseMozilla Public License - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mozilla_Public_License

   • Cached

   Common Public Attribution License; Erlang Public License 1.1 (modified MPL 1.0, where "disagreements are settled under Swedish law in English") Firebird's Initial Developer's Public License [Wikidata] (based on MPL v1.1) Sun Public License; Yahoo! Public License; Openbravo's Openbravo Public License (based on MPL v1.1) See also. Free and open ...

4. Videos

   • 

     3:26

     youtube.com

     MPL (Mozilla Public License) Open Source license in a nutshell

     Jun 18, 2021

     4.4K Views

   • 

     0:48

     youtube.com

     How Can I Understand the Mozilla Public License (MPL) in Simple Terms?

     Sep 19, 2023

     36 Views

   • 

     4:52

     youtube.com

     What is a Commercial Learner's Permit and how to get one

     Jul 6, 2022

     10.8K Views

   View all

5. stackoverflow.com › questions › 2073477Can I use Mozilla Public License 1.1 (MPL) in a commercial ...

   stackoverflow.com › questions › 2073477

   • Cached

   Aug 12, 2015 · MPL: people can take your code, modify it, but if they distribute the modifications, they need to make sure modifications are publicly available for 3 years. If I don't touch the source code at all, but only use the .jar files in my code, do I need to license my code under MPL as well? rabbitmq. mozilla. edited Aug 12, 2015 at 23:55. durron597.

   Code sample

   -

   - 6.3. Derivative Works.

   - If You create or use a modified version of this License (which you may

   - only do in order to apply it to code which is not already Covered Code

   - governed by this L...

   See more on stackoverflow

6. www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPLMozilla Public Licence — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPL

   • Cached

   Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source / free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 ( html | plain text ). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ.

7. People also ask

   When did the Mozilla Public License come out?

   • Version 1.0 of the Mozilla Public License (MPL) was released in 1998, with a slightly modified Version 1.1 introduced the following year. Over a decade later, in 2010, Mozilla Public License 2.0 made its debut, and has remained the MPL of choice ever since.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-mozilla-public-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

   What is the Mozilla Public License (MPL)?

   • The Mozilla Public License ( MPL) is a free and open-source weak copyleft license for most Mozilla Foundation software such as Firefox and Thunderbird.

   Mozilla Public License - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Public_License

   See all results for this question

   Does the Mozilla Foundation have an open source license?

   • It’s therefore no surprise that the Mozilla Foundation has created its own open source license, the Mozilla Public License. Version 1.0 of the Mozilla Public License (MPL) was released in 1998, with a slightly modified Version 1.1 introduced the following year.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-mozilla-public-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

   Does Mozilla have an open source license?

   • Open source software contributors, however, may also know Mozilla for its commitment to keeping the internet a free and public resource, a mission that matches the ethos of OSS development. It’s therefore no surprise that the Mozilla Foundation has created its own open source license, the Mozilla Public License.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-mozilla-public-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

8. www.mozilla.org › MPL › 2Mozilla Public License 2.0: Changes from MPL 1.1

   www.mozilla.org › MPL › 2

   • Cached

   Mozilla Public License 2.0: Redline from MPL 1.1. Text that is red and struck through has been removed in MPL 2.0. Text that is blue and underlined has been added in MPL 2.0. Mouse over the highlighted text to get a further explanation of that change in the license. Note that these explanations are not the license.

9. fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101

   • Cached

   Users of MPL 2.0-licensed code may: Use the code in commercial applications. MPL’d code can be included in software that’s sold commercially. Change the code. Authors can alter or modify the licensed code. Distribute the code. An individual or company can make their reworked version (s) of the code available to others. Use patent claims.

10. www.oreilly.com › library › viewThe Mozilla Public License 1.1 (MPL 1.1) - O'Reilly Media

    www.oreilly.com › library › view

    • Cached

    Definitions. 1.0.1. "Commercial Use" means distribution or otherwise making the Covered Code available to a third party. Commercial Use is defined in a somewhat counterintuitive way. As defined, it includes any form of distribution, whether in exchange for payment or not. 1.1.