Search results
- A decorator who stole three watches worth more than £30,000 from the Duke of Westminster's home has been spared jail "by the skin of his teeth". Matthew Turner was given a 20-month sentence, suspended for two years, at Chester Crown Court after he admitted the burglary.
www.bbc.com › news › uk-england-merseyside-68113790
People also ask
What was Westminster City Council V Duke of Westminster?
How much was the 6th Duke of Westminster worth?
What was Westminster v Westminster?
Why was Westminster slum demolished?
In March 2007, having served in the Ministry of Defence as Assistant CDS for four years, he handed over responsibility for 50,000 reservists and 138,000 cadets to Major General Simon Lalor, in the wake of the Eliot Spitzer prostitution scandal in which Westminster was also implicated.
Apr 2, 2019 · When Gerald Grosvenor, 6th Duke of Westminster, died in August 2016 he was the third richest person in Britain and one of the world’s wealthiest men, with a fortune of £10 billion. Yet Gerald’s wealth caused him, at times, to feel as though he were imprisoned.
- (142)
- Tom Quinn
Jan 26, 2024 · A decorator who stole three watches worth more than £30,000 from the Duke of Westminster's home has been spared jail "by the skin of his teeth". Matthew Turner was given a 20-month sentence...
When Gerald Grosvenor, sixth Duke of Westminster, died in August 2016 he was one of the world's richest men, his fortune estimated at just under GBP10 billion. Yet he hated his wealth and spent long periods suffering from severe depression, much of it brought on by a feeling that his whole life had been a failure and that his money had ...
Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster was a case between Westminster City Council and the 6th Duke of Westminster (and fellow family trust co-trustees) heard in November 1990. The dispute concerned 532 flats in Page Street, Vincent Street and Regency Street, Pimlico, London.
Dec 14, 2022 · A company owned by Prince George’s godfather, the Duke of Westminster, must pay £13,200 in compensation to a businessman who claimed it failed to stamp out ‘seedy’ behaviour that had caused a ‘nuisance’ on his ‘quiet’ residential street in Mayfair.