Yahoo Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: prime number theory

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. In mathematics, the prime number theorem (PNT) describes the asymptotic distribution of the prime numbers among the positive integers. It formalizes the intuitive idea that primes become less common as they become larger by precisely quantifying the rate at which this occurs.

    • Overview
    • Number theory in the 20th century
    • Unsolved problems

    One of the supreme achievements of 19th-century mathematics was the prime number theorem, and it is worth a brief digression. To begin, designate the number of primes less than or equal to n by π(n). Thus π(10) = 4 because 2, 3, 5, and 7 are the four primes not exceeding 10. Similarly π(25) = 9 and π(100) = 25. Next, consider the proportion of numbers less than or equal to n that are prime—i.e., π(n)/n. Clearly π(10)/10 = 0.40, meaning that 40 percent of the numbers not exceeding 10 are prime. Other proportions are shown in the Click Here to see full-size tabletable.

    A pattern is anything but clear, but the prime number theorem identifies one, at least approximately, and thereby provides a rule for the distribution of primes among the whole numbers. The theorem says that, for large n, the proportion π(n)/n is roughly 1/log n, where log n is the natural logarithm of n. This link between primes and logs is nothing short of extraordinary.

    The next century saw an explosion in number theoretic research. Along with classical and analytic number theory, scholars now explored specialized subfields such as algebraic number theory, geometric number theory, and combinatorial number theory. The concepts became more abstract and the techniques more sophisticated. Unquestionably, the subject had grown beyond Fermat’s wildest dreams.

    One of the great contributors from early in the 20th century was the incandescent genius Srinivasa Ramanujan (1887–1920). Ramanujan, whose formal training was as limited as his life was short, burst upon the mathematical scene with a series of brilliant discoveries. Analytic number theory was among his specialties, and his publications carried titles such as “Highly composite numbers” and “Proof that almost all numbers n are composed of about log(log n) prime factors.”

    A legendary figure in 20th-century number theory was Paul Erdős (1913–96), a Hungarian genius known for his deep insights, his vast circle of collaborators, and his personal eccentricities. At age 18, Erdős published a much-simplified proof of a theorem of Chebyshev stating that, if n ≥ 2, then there must be a prime between n and 2n. This was the first in a string of number theoretic results that would span most of the century. In the process, Erdős—who also worked in combinatorics, graph theory, and dimension theory—published over 1,500 papers with more than 500 collaborators from around the world. He achieved this astonishing output while living more or less out of a suitcase, traveling constantly from one university to another in pursuit of new mathematics. It was not uncommon for him to arrive, unannounced, with the declaration that “My brain is open” and then to plunge into the latest problem with gusto.

    Two later developments deserve mention. One was the invention of the electronic computer, whose speed has been advantageously applied to number theoretic questions. As an example, Euler once speculated that at least four fourth powers must be added together for the sum to be a fourth power. But in 1988, using a combination of mathematical insight and computer muscle, the American Noam Elkies discovered that 2,682,4404 + 15,365,6394 + 18,796,7604 = 20,615,6734—a stupendous counterexample that destroyed Euler’s conjecture. (The number on the right contains 30 digits, so there is little wonder that Euler missed it.)

    Second, number theory acquired an applied flavour, for it became instrumental in designing encryption schemes widely used in government and business. These rely upon the factorization of gigantic numbers into primes—a factorization that the code’s user knows and the potential code-breaker does not. This application runs counter to the long-held perception of number theory as beautiful but essentially useless. (See cryptology: Cryptography.)

    Twentieth-century number theory reached a much-publicized climax in 1995, when Fermat’s last theorem was proved by the Englishman Andrew Wiles, with timely assistance from his British colleague Richard Taylor. Wiles succeeded where so many had failed with a 130-page proof of incredible complexity, one that certainly would not fit into any margin.

    This triumph notwithstanding, number theory remains the source of many unsolved problems, some of the most perplexing of which sound innocent enough. For example:

    1.Do any odd perfect numbers exist?

    2.Are there infinitely many primes of the form n2 + 1 (i.e., one more than a perfect square)?

    3.Are there infinitely many pairs of twin primes (i.e., primes that differ by 2, like 5 and 7 or 41 and 43)?

    4.Is Goldbach’s conjecture true? (Euler failed to prove it; so has everyone since.)

    Although there has been no lack of effort, these questions remain open. Perhaps, like Fermat’s last theorem, they will eventually be resolved. Or perhaps they will remain as challenges into the indefinite future. In order to spur research efforts across a wide range of mathematical disciplines, the privately funded Clay Mathematics Institute of Cambridge, Massachusetts, named seven “Millennium Prize Problems” in 2000, each with a million-dollar award for a correct solution. In any case, these mysteries justify Eric Temple Bell’s characterization of number theory as “the last great uncivilized continent of mathematics.”

  3. 5 days ago · The prime number theorem gives an asymptotic form for the prime counting function pi(n), which counts the number of primes less than some integer n. Legendre (1808) suggested that for large n, pi(n)∼n/(lnn+B), (1) with B=-1.08366 (where B is sometimes called Legendre's constant), a formula which is correct in the leading term only, n/(lnn+B ...

  4. Prime Number Theorem. A. Anas Chentouf. December 29, 2021. This manuscript contains notes for the proof of the prime number theorem that was presented in the Fall 2021 ofering of MIT’s 18.112 (de facto Complex Analysis), taught by Professor Alexei Borodin.

  5. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Prime_numberPrime number - Wikipedia

    Primes are central in number theory because of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic: every natural number greater than 1 is either a prime itself or can be factorized as a product of primes that is unique up to their order. The property of being prime is called primality.

  6. The theorem that answers this question is the prime number theorem. We denote by \ (\pi (x)\) the number of primes less than a given positive number \ (x\). Many mathematicians worked on this theorem and conjectured many estimates before Chebyshev finally stated that the estimate is \ (x/log x\).

  7. 1 is the only positive integer that is neither prime nor composite. Prime numbers are critical for the study of number theory. Nearly all theorems in number theory involve prime numbers or can be traced back to prime numbers in some way. Prime numbers are also important for the study of cryptography.

  1. Searches related to prime number theory

    number theory problemsprime number theory proof
  1. People also search for