Search results
The meaning of REASONABLE DOUBT is a doubt especially about the guilt of a criminal defendant that arises or remains upon fair and thorough consideration of the evidence or lack thereof. How to use reasonable doubt in a sentence.
Apr 30, 2024 · Reasonable doubt is legal terminology referring to insufficient evidence that prevents a judge or jury from convicting a defendant of a crime. It is the traditional...
A reasonable doubt is not a doubt based upon sympathy or prejudice and, instead, is based on reason and common sense. Reasonable doubt is logically connected to the evidence or absence of evidence. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not involve proof to an absolute certainty.
reasonable doubt - The level of certainty a juror must have to find a defendant guilty of a crime, which is such that a reasonable person would have, under the circumstances presented.
Beyond a reasonable doubt is the legal burden of proof required to affirm a conviction in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proving that the defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt.
A standard of proof that must be surpassed to convict an accused in a criminal proceeding. Reasonable doubt is a standard of proof used in criminal trials. When a criminal defendant is prosecuted, the prosecutor must prove the defendant's guilt Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.
Find the legal definition of REASONABLE DOUBT from Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition. This term refers to the lack of proof that prevents a judge or jury from convicting a defendant a crime.
Although a criminal conviction is generally established by a jury using the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard, sentencing factors are generally evaluated by a judge using few evidentiary rules and under the more lenient “preponderance of the evidence” standard.
reasonable doubt. Sufficient doubt on the part of jurors for acquittal of a defendant based on a lack of evidence.
- dictionary.findlaw.com
- › R
A reasonable doubt exists when a factfinder cannot say with moral certainty that a person is guilty or a particular fact exists. It must be more than an imaginary doubt, and it is often defined judicially as such doubt as would cause a reasonable person to hesitate before acting in a matter of importance.
