Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Main beliefs. The Anti-Federalists were against the ratification of the Constitution for many reasons. The Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a loss of individual liberties, an erosion of state sovereignty, and the potential for the rise of tyranny.

  2. Feb 3, 2022 · Humanities › Issues. Who Were the Anti-Federalists? Bettmann Archive / Getty Images. By. Robert Longley. Updated on February 03, 2022. Not all Americans liked the new U.S. Constitution offered to them in 1787. Some, particularly the Anti-Federalists, downright hated it.

    • Robert Longley
  3. May 11, 2018 · With only a few exceptions, anti-Federalists agreed to abide by the ratified Constitution. Their reasoning was that good citizens are obligated to support all laws. If anti-Federalists did not accept the ratified Constitution, then anybody who fundamentally disagreed with a law could refuse to follow it.

  4. A brawl between Federalists and anti-Federalists, 1788 | In 1787 and 1788, debates over the ratification of the Constitution took place in towns and villages across the country. To gain support, both Federalists and anti-Federalists held meetings and marches that sometimes became violent.

  5. Why would Anti-Federalists write from the point of view of the aristocrats? What evidence in this document shows the aristocrats’ supposed contempt for the average citizen? Now put those thoughts into your own words.

  6. Aug 8, 2019 · In early August 1787, the Constitutional Convention’s Committee of Detail had just presented its preliminary draft of the Constitution to the rest of the delegates, and the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were beginning to parse some of the biggest foundational debates over what American government should look like.

  7. Sep 2, 2020 · Power Anti-Federalists were “the truest federalists in the debate”; they “were less concerned about the people as individuals” and more concerned about the distribution of powers, both within the national government and between the national and state governments (pp. ix, x, 25).