Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. Rating

   • 6.2/10 6.2/10 IMDb
   • 60% 60% Rotten Tomatoes

1. www.rottentomatoes.com › m › 1190529-1190529-to_killTo Kill a King | Rotten Tomatoes

   www.rottentomatoes.com › m › 1190529-1190529-to_kill

   • Cached

   It's a good period drama, but it might have been better suited to TV, but Roth and Scott make good leads, with Everett perfectly cast as the foppish king Charles. ... To Kill a King (2003) To Kill ...

   • See All Photos

     To Kill a King Pictures and Photo Gallery -- Check out just...

   • Arn: The Knight Templar

     Not the best crusader type movie I ever saw. Rated 2/5 Stars...

   • Movie Reviews

     To Kill a King is no Man for All Seasons, that poem to...

   • Blue Sky

     In the late 1950s, the U.S. Army assigns nuclear engineer...

2. Videos

   • 

     1:39

     imdb.com

     To Kill a King (2003)

     Apr 11, 2008

   • 

     1:52

     youtube.com

     To Kill a King (2003) Trailer

     Aug 21, 2011

     72.6K Views

   • 

     2:46

     youtube.com

     TO KILL A KING "King Charles - last rites"

     Sep 23, 2014

     54.3K Views

   View all

3. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › To_Kill_a_King_(film)To Kill a King (film) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › To_Kill_a_King_(film)

   • Cached

   To Kill a King is a 2003 English Civil War film directed by Mike Barker, and starring Tim Roth, Rupert Everett and Dougray Scott. It centres on the relationship between Oliver Cromwell and Thomas Fairfax in the post-war period from 1648 until the former's death, in 1658. The plot includes considerable artistic license with historical facts.

4. www.imdb.com › title › tt0302436To Kill a King (2003) - IMDb

   www.imdb.com › title › tt0302436

   • Cached

   To Kill a King: Directed by Mike Barker. With Tim Roth, Dougray Scott, Olivia Williams, James Bolam. A recounting of the relationship between General Fairfax and Oliver Cromwell, as they try to cope with the consequences of deposing King Charles I.

   • 6.2/10 (3.4K)
   • Genre: Biography, Drama, History

   • Director: Mike Barker
   • Release Date: 2003

5. People also ask

   Is to kill a king a good movie?

   • For history teachers and folks in the know, "To Kill a King" is good stuff--well acted and produced (even if the army of the Parliament only seems to have been made up of about 50 guys in this film!). Otherwise, it does seem to be lacking context which would make it easier to follow--as well as very low energy despite the theme.

   To Kill a King (2003) - User Reviews - IMDb

   www.imdb.com/title/tt0302436/reviews

   See all results for this question

   Is 'to kill a king' worth watching?

   • This is the case with 'To Kill a King'. As an aide to history it is without value, because the events and conflicts it portrays were almost certainly nothing like the film-makers would have us believe. And as pure entertainment it's unpardonably slow.

   To Kill a King (2003) - User Reviews - IMDb

   www.imdb.com/title/tt0302436/reviews

   See all results for this question

   What is to kill a king about?

   • To Kill a King is an unusually bold and blunt attempt to recount events during a critical period in English history. That it takes a few liberties with the truth is only to be expected; these happen mostly in order to compact important matters into a shorter timeframe, and we encounter no infuriating historical deviations.

   To Kill A King (2003) Movie Review from Eye for Film

   www.eyeforfilm.co.uk/review/to-kill-a-king-film-review-by-jennie-kermode

   See all results for this question

   Is King Charles I a good movie?

   • This is a film about friendship and assorted forms of love, but it avoids being overly simplistic. It is also unabashedly political, and shows politics as a complex business, making good cases for several different positions. This hinges on a career-best performance by Rupert Everett as King Charles I.

   To Kill A King (2003) Movie Review from Eye for Film

   www.eyeforfilm.co.uk/review/to-kill-a-king-film-review-by-jennie-kermode

   See all results for this question

6. www.imdb.com › title › tt0302436To Kill a King (2003) - To Kill a King (2003) - User Reviews ...

   www.imdb.com › title › tt0302436

   • Cached

   To Kill A King, is a fine underrated historical drama. The story of Oliver Cromwell's complex friendship with General Fairfax, set against the backdrop of the war against King Charles I, is an engaging and dramatic one. With vivid and memorable characterizations, excellent production design, the film evokes a time of change and reform, and also ...

7. www.eyeforfilm.co.uk › review › to-kill-a-king-filmTo Kill A King (2003) Movie Review from Eye for Film

   www.eyeforfilm.co.uk › review › to-kill-a-king-film

   • Cached

   Though its ugly battle scenes and fabulous costumes are really nothing new, To Kill a King does have a strong sense of place (and period), especially as we see increasing numbers of puritans exerting their influence politically and socially. It's not hugely exciting or revelatory, but it's a good, solid little film aware of its own limits, and ...

8. www.timeout.com › movies › to-kill-a-kingTo Kill a King 2003, directed by Mike Barker | Film review

   www.timeout.com › movies › to-kill-a-king

   • Cached

   Sep 10, 2012 · The performances are generally solid (Everett strong but too self-aggrandising, Scott grave and effective if lacking in 'Darcy' charisma), but Roth's characterisation is a fatal mistake. There's a ...