Yahoo Web Search

Search results

    • Constitutes a genocide

      • The Trail of Tears constitutes a genocide because it was deliberate in its removal, targeted a specific population, and led to the death of thousands of Native Americans.
      crgreview.com › the-trail-of-tears-and-american-genocide
  1. People also ask

  2. Nov 9, 2009 · The Trail of Tears was the deadly route used by Native Americans when forced off their ancestral lands and into Oklahoma by the Indian Removal Act of 1830.

  3. In contrast, some scholars have debated that the Trail of Tears was a genocidal act. [12] [33] [138] Historian Jeffrey Ostler argues that the threat of genocide was used to ensure Natives' compliance with removal policies, [12] [139] : 1 and concludes that, "In its outcome and in the means used to gain compliance, the policy had genocidal ...

  4. Mar 2, 2018 · A painting depicting the Trail of Tears, when Native Americans were forced by law to leave their homelands and move to designated territory in the west

  5. The Trail of Tears was the forced relocation during the 1830s of Indigenous peoples of the Southeast region of the United States (including the Cherokee, Creek, Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Seminole, among others) to the so-called Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River.

    • Was the trail of Tears a genocidal act?1
    • Was the trail of Tears a genocidal act?2
    • Was the trail of Tears a genocidal act?3
    • Was the trail of Tears a genocidal act?4
    • Was the trail of Tears a genocidal act?5
  6. Jan 29, 2024 · Idea for Use in the Classroom. The Trail of Tears is the name given to the forced migration of the Cherokee people from their ancestral lands in Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, and North Carolina to new territories west of the Mississippi River. The journey, undertaken in the fall and winter of 1838–1839, was fatal for one-fourth of the Cherokee ...

  7. About 20,000 Cherokees were marched westward at gunpoint on the infamous Trail of Tears. Nearly a quarter perished on the way, with the remainder left to seek survival in a completely foreign land. The tribe became hopelessly divided as the followers of Ross murdered those who signed the Treaty of New Echota.

  8. Aug 3, 2023 · Most Cherokees opposed removal. Yet a minority felt that it was futile to continue to fight. They believed that they might survive as a people only if they signed a treaty with the United States. In December 1835, the U.S. sought out this minority to effect a treaty at New Echota, Georgia.

  1. People also search for