Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. MOZILLA PUBLIC LICENSEVersion 1.0. MOZILLA PUBLIC LICENSE. Version 1.0. 1. Definitions. 1.1. ``Contributor'' means each entity that creates or contributes to the creation of Modifications. 1.2. ``Contributor Version'' means the combination of the Original Code, prior Modifications used by a Contributor, and the Modifications made by that ...

  2. Mozilla Public License, version 1.0. 1. Definitions. 1.1. "Contributor" means each entity that creates or contributes to the creation of Modifications. 1.2. "Contributor Version" means the combination of the Original Code, prior Modifications used by a Contributor, and the Modifications made by that particular Contributor. 1.3.

  3. 7. What has not changed between MPL 1.1 and MPL 2.0? The most important part of the license - the file-level copyleft - is essentially the same in MPL 2.0 and MPL 1.1. 8. What has changed between MPL 1.1 and MPL 2.0? The primary change is simplification. For example, rather than exactly specifying the amount of time source code must be ...

  4. These files are made available for historical and reference purposes only, and should not be used to license software. Mozilla Public License, version 1.1 This is the Mozilla Public License, version 1.1. It is also available in plain text. MPL 1.1 is obsoleted by MPL 2.0, and Mozilla strongly recommends against using this license for new code.

  5. Mozilla公共许可证. Mozilla公共许可证 (英語: Mozilla Public License ,简称 MPL )是个 自由 、 开源 、详细的 软件许可证 ,由 Mozilla基金会 开发并维护。. 该條款融合了 BSD许可证 和 GNU通用公共许可证 的特性,追求平衡 专有软件 和开源软件开发者之间的顾虑。. [6 ...

  6. Mozilla Public License Version 2.0. 1. Definitions. 1.1. "Contributor" means each individual or legal entity that creates, contributes to the creation of, or owns Covered Software. 1.2. "Contributor Version" means the combination of the Contributions of others (if any) used by a Contributor and that particular Contributor's Contribution. 1.3.

  7. MPL is a practical license designed by Mozilla to enforce some kind of share-alike to the original library, while still encouraging people to make proprietary softwares and add-ons on top (including Mozilla itself), which is a practice that the FSF authorizes via LGPL but still considers harmful.

  1. People also search for