Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. 2 days ago · A prominent critic of deliberative democracy (especially in its Rawlsian and Habermasian versions), she is also known for her use of the work of Carl Schmitt, mainly his concept of "the political", in proposing a radicalization of modern democracy—what she calls "agonistic pluralism".

  2. Jul 5, 2024 · In the preface to Agonistic Assemblies, a book that explores the socio-political dimension of urban design edited by Markus Miessen, Chantal Mouffe brings up agonism as a model of democracy.

  3. 5 days ago · The first and most noted strand of radical democracy is the agonistic perspective, which is associated with the work of Laclau and Mouffe. Radical democracy was articulated by Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe in their book Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, written in 1985.

  4. 23 hours ago · Ruitenberg’s paper meticulously dissects the differences between Mouffe’s agonistic model and Rawls’s deliberative democracy, particularly in their conceptions of conflict and politics. Through a comparative analysis, the authors reveal how Mouffe’s framework calls for a radical rethinking of political education—one that embraces ...

  5. 3 days ago · Moderation, as embodied in compromises, is not desirable because it erases the lines of confrontation. Chantal Mouffe – an advocate of left-wing populism in her later work Footnote 30 —reminds us that politics cannot be reduced to the sheer competition between divergent interests likely to be aligned through elite deliberation or summit ...

  6. Jul 25, 2024 · This article argues that repurposing built spaces marred by racial modernism constitutes a planning “next practice”: incrementally, repurposing suggests what forms of spatial transformation are possible. Synthesizing primary interviews, archival data, in-situ analyses of urban space, and secondary sources, the article traces how bureaucrats ...

  7. People also ask

  8. Jul 5, 2024 · This work demonstrated what Chantal Mouffe finds possible in democracy, conceived of not as constitutionally rigid, but as a “purposive association” whose “allegiances to specific communities” are less about group affiliation than the idea of imperfect association—association that thrives on the learning brought of difference. 9 ...