Search results
Federalist No. 70, titled " The Executive Department Further Considered ", is an essay written by Alexander Hamilton arguing for a single, robust executive provided for in the United States Constitution.
Jan 4, 2002 · The Federalist No. 70 1. [New York, March 15, 1788] To the People of the State of New-York. THERE is an idea, which is not without its advocates, that a vigorous executive is inconsistent with the genius of republican government.
News about Heritage Foundation, Kevin Roberts, Project 2025
News about Supreme Court, Trump v. U.S., immunity
Also in the news
Discover the Federalist 70 main points and learn the arguments made by Alexander Hamilton, who wrote Federalist 70, and why he believed in a strong executive branch to protect liberty and self-government.
Federalist 68: THE mode of appointment of the Chief Magistrate of the United States is almost the only part of the system, of any consequence, which has escaped without severe censure, or which has received the slightest mark of approbation from its opponents.
The ingredients which constitute energy in the executive are unity; duration; an adequate provision for its support; and competent powers. The ingredients which constitute safety in the republican sense are a due dependence on the people, secondly a due responsibility.
Decision, activity, secrecy, and despatch will generally characterize the proceedings of one man in a much more eminent degree than the proceedings of any greater number; and in proportion as the number is increased, these qualities will be diminished.
Read Full Text and Annotations on The Federalist Papers FEDERALIST No. 70. The Executive Department Further Considered at Owl Eyes.
Sep 4, 2013 · The ingredients which constitute energy in the executive are unity; duration; an adequate provision for its support; and competent powers. The ingredients which constitute safety in the republican sense are a due dependence on the people, secondly a due responsibility.
Federalist Number (No.) 70 (1788) is an essay by British-American politician Alexander Hamilton arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution. The full title of the essay is "The Executive Department Further Considered."
Apr 25, 2024 · The person of the king of Great Britain is sacred and inviolable; there is no constitutional tribunal to which he is amenable; no punishment to which he can be subjected without involving the crisis of a national revolution.
