Search results
3 days ago · Assuming our team sports designations applied by Yarvin to the late eighteenth century, what do they mean, anyway? Yarvin’s usage seems to imply, embarrassingly, an attachment to forms and tradition—the bones—and an ignorance of the meat, the things underlying and ostensibly served by the forms.
Apr 28, 2024 · Even the problems the USG is solving seem best explained by historical factors. What is the purpose of US foreign policy? In the context of 20th-century world history, what the State Department does today makes sense. How else could it be explained? If the Deep State got a boss—the first thing that boss would do is fire the Deep State.
May 2, 2024 · Then try to figure out which one has greater utility in the current environment. All of the aforementioned moral foundations have utility, but some have more than others depending on the political climate. I will review this in upcoming essays. I have Yarvin sympathies due to a "fix the actual problem and stop with the surrogate activities ...
May 8, 2024 · While Yarvin gives the example of America’s relative benevolence towards the defeated Germans and Japanese, after WWII, he glosses over the Soviet’s brutal revenge against Germany, the Communist Revolution, and countless other historical examples of new totalitarian regimes that brutally purged their former adversaries.
Apr 27, 2024 · Please make sure your historical theories are consistent across time. When we shift our interpretation of the Constitution from the age of legislative and judicial supremacy—one thinks of Justice Sotomayor’s description of Federal appeals court as “where policy gets made,” back to the executive Hamiltonian structure of the original ...
Nov 23, 2021 · By Curtis Yarvin. | Gray Mirror. To teach high-school stuff to the bright, but poorly educated, preteen son of a close friend of the blog. In the Berkeley area near campus. 20 hrs/week, flexible daytime schedule, $50/hr or so. Previous tutoring / homeschooling experience desired.
4 days ago · No paragraph could make clearer the difference between the old historical political science, which actually worked, and the new realistic political science, which is bogus. Actually, even when the 20th century needed to do a conquest that worked, it forgot about hearts and minds and did it the solid Vattel way. Look at post-1945 Germany!
