Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.nytimes.com › nuclear-weapons-nytimesOpinion | At the Brink: Confronting the Risk of Nuclear War ...

   www.nytimes.com › nuclear-weapons-nytimes

   May 22, 2024 · The United States could insist on robust controls for artificial intelligence in the launch processes of nuclear weapons. Democracy rarely prevents war, but it can eventually serve as a check...

2. www.scientificamerican.com › article › nuclearNuclear Weapons at Any Price? Congress Should Say No

   www.scientificamerican.com › article › nuclear

   • Cached

   May 13, 2024 · Supporting nuclear modernization at any price is neither necessary nor affordable. Instead, Congress needs to improve, and be held accountable for, fiscal oversight of the nuclear arsenal.

3. Videos

   • 

     2:55

     youtube.com

     The threat of nuclear weapons, explained | JUST THE FAQS

     Apr 8, 2022

     10.9K Views

   • 

     1:23:28

     youtube.com

     2. Reducing the Danger of Nuclear Weapons and Proliferation

     Jul 31, 2015

     5K Views

   • 

     2:45

     bbc.com

     Nuclear weapons: Explained in numbers

     Sep 25, 2019

   View all

4. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Debate_over_the_atomicDebate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Debate_over_the_atomic

   • Cached

   3 days ago · When Vladimir Putin annexed the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts after invading Ukraine, he said the U.S. was the only country to have used nuclear weapons and set a “precedent”. He wanted to use the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as justification for the possible use of Russian nuclear weapons in the war in Ukraine.

5. www.vpm.org › npr-news › npr-newsDoes the U.S. need new nuclear weapons? | VPM

   www.vpm.org › npr-news › npr-news

   • Cached

   May 15, 2024 · Part I. ASSOCIATION OF AIR FORCE MISSILEERS: A new ICBM baseline design, which will deploy 400 new missiles, update 450 silos, and modernize more than 600 facilities across almost 40,000 square miles of U.S. territory, which spans over six states, three operational wings, and a test location.

6. www.nytimes.com › 2024/06/02 › opinionOpinion | The Widespread Harm of Nuclear Testing - The New ...

   www.nytimes.com › 2024/06/02 › opinion

   3 days ago · The federal government’s nuclear weapons testing program was an assault on its own citizens — an assault that didn’t stop with the end of the Cold War. ... generating strong pros and cons ...

7. www.vpm.org › npr-news › 2024/05/15Does the U.S. need new nuclear weapons? | VPM

   www.vpm.org › npr-news › 2024/05/15

   • Cached

   May 15, 2024 · NPR News. The U.S. is building new nuclear weapons, including a massive missile called the Sentinel. They're up to 20 times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

8. thebulletin.org › 2024 › 06Why a substantive and verifiable no-first-use treaty for ...

   thebulletin.org › 2024 › 06

   • Cached

   1 day ago · A clause prohibiting the threat of first use of nuclear weapons, if included in the treaty, is verifiable. With a no-first-use treaty in place, if a state party intends to threaten to use nuclear weapons first would mean it can only withdraw from the treaty or violate its no-first-use commitment, raising the cost of signaling a nuclear threat.

9. People also ask

   Does Congress have bipartisan support for nuclear weapons?

   • Bipartisanship seems rare in Congress these days. But one place to consistently find agreement between Democrats and Republicans is support for modernizing the U.S. nuclear arsenal —currently numbering almost 5,000 nuclear warheads, plus the triad of missiles, submarines and bombers to deliver them.

   Nuclear Weapons at Any Price? Congress Should Say No

   www.scientificamerican.com/article/nuclear-weapons-at-any-price-congress-should-say-no/

   See all results for this question

   Should Congress be held accountable for the nuclear arsenal?

   • Instead, Congress needs to improve, and be held accountable for, fiscal oversight of the nuclear arsenal. Congress should first start by looking at the intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). In January of this year, the Air Force announced that the price tag for its new ICBM—the Sentinel—had increased by more than 37 percent.

   Nuclear Weapons at Any Price? Congress Should Say No

   www.scientificamerican.com/article/nuclear-weapons-at-any-price-congress-should-say-no/

   See all results for this question

   Should Congress support nuclear modernization?

   • Supporting nuclear modernization at any price is neither necessary nor affordable. Instead, Congress needs to improve, and be held accountable for, fiscal oversight of the nuclear arsenal. Congress should first start by looking at the intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).

   Nuclear Weapons at Any Price? Congress Should Say No

   www.scientificamerican.com/article/nuclear-weapons-at-any-price-congress-should-say-no/

   See all results for this question

   Are Eisenhower & Kennedy right to end nuclear testing?

   • Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy were both right to pursue a treaty ending all nuclear testing. We have to finish the job today and take a big step to make the world safe from nuclear weapons. The writer is the author of “The Road to Peace: From the Disarming of the Great Lakes to the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.”

   The Widespread Harm of Nuclear Testing

   www.nytimes.com/2024/06/02/opinion/nuclear-testing.html

   See all results for this question