Search results
May 3, 2024 · Summary judgment is a pretrial motion that promptly resolves legal actions where the parties have no genuine issues with any material fact. The court produces a judgment for one party against the opposing party without needing a full trial. How a Motion for Summary Judgment Works.
4 days ago · Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), [1] was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States generally protected a right to have an abortion.
May 13, 2024 · Anatomy of a Decision. Whether you are looking at a legal decision from a database or a case law reporter, it will typically consist of the following sections: Style of cause: e.g. R v Desautel -- the names of the parties to the legal dispute. In a civil case the plaintiff or "initiator" is named first. In criminal cases, the "R" representing ...
- Leslie Taylor
- 2016
3 days ago · Correction: Chiefs-Butker story. Roe v. Wade, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on January 22, 1973, ruled (7–2) that unduly restrictive state regulation of abortion is unconstitutional. In a majority opinion written by Justice Harry A. Blackmun, the Court held that a set of Texas statutes criminalizing abortion in most instances ...
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
May 2, 2024 · Case Summary. This case was the first sexual harassment case brought under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., which bans sex discrimination in education by institutions that receive federal funding. On July 3, 1977, several female students enrolled at Yale College and a faculty member filed this suit in the ...
2 days ago · Abortion, the expulsion of a fetus from the uterus before it has reached the stage of viability (in human beings, usually about the 20th week of gestation). An abortion may occur spontaneously, in which case it is also called a miscarriage, or it may be brought on purposefully.
Apr 30, 2024 · Case Summary: Case 148/78 Publico Ministero v. Ratti [1979] ECR 1629. In the case of Bellinger v Bellinger [2003] UKHL 21, it was ruled that the Section 11 (c) of Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 is incompatible with Section 4 article 8 and 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights Act 1998.
