Search results
People also ask
Who wrote Federalist No 48?
What did Federalist No 48 argue?
What is the argument of No 48?
Who relied on the security of the Constitution?
Federalist No. 48 is an essay by James Madison, the forty-eighth of the Federalist Papers. It was first published by The New York Packet on February 1, 1788, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all the Federalist Papers were published. This paper builds on Federalist No. 47.
Jan 10, 2002 · “The Federalist Number 48, [1 February] 1788,” Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-10-02-0269. [Original source: The Papers of James Madison , vol. 10, 27 May 1787–3 March 1788 , ed. Robert A. Rutland, Charles F. Hobson, William M. E. Rachal, and Frederika J. Teute.
The Federalist Papers : No. 48. From the New York Packet. Friday, February 1, 1788. To the People of the State of New York: IT WAS shown in the last paper that the political apothegm there examined does not require that the legislative, executive, and judiciary departments should be wholly unconnected with each other.
Federalist 47, Federalist 48, and Federalist 51. by James Madison & Publius. February 1, 1788. Edited and introduced by J. David Alvis and Joseph Postell. Version One. Version two Version three Version four Version five. Image: The Federalist, on the new Constitution.
The Federalist No. 48 | The Federalist Papers Project. Balance of Powers. Summary (not in original) Having shown that separation of powers does not require full disconnection, we move to the requirement for some such interconnections. It is agreed that no department should have overruling power over another.
Federalist Number (No.) 48 (1788) is an essay by British-American politician James Madison arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution. The full title of the essay is "These Departments Should Not Be So Far Separated as to Have No Constitutional Control Over Each Other."
If you look at The Federalist No. 48, you will see that Madison was most concerned with the power that had been given to the new national Congress.2 In fact, he famously described Congress in The Federalist No. 48 as the “impetuous vortex” into which all power would be sucked but for the separation of powers.3 He was particularly concerned about...
