Doug Jeffery
Richard Lovejoy
Search results
In criminal law, irresistible impulse is a defense by excuse, in this case some sort of insanity, in which the defendant argues that they should not be held criminally liable for their actions that broke the law, because they could not control those actions, even if they knew them to be wrong. [1]
The irresistible impulse test is a legal doctrine that applies to the insanity defense in criminal cases. Under this test, a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if they demonstrate that they suffered from a mental disease or defect that made it impossible for them to resist an impulse to commit a crime .
- www.findlaw.com
- › …
- › Criminal Law
- › Criminal Procedure
Dec 5, 2023 · Unlike the M'Naghten Rule, the irresistible impulse test goes beyond looking at a defendant's awareness of right and wrong. It also evaluates their capacity to resist impulses leading to unlawful acts.
The meaning of IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE is an overpowering impulse produced by mental disease or defect that leads to the commission of a criminal act (as murder).
Irresistible Impulse Insanity Defense. Another variation of the insanity defense is the irresistible impulse defense. This defense has lost popularity over the years and is rejected by most of the states and the federal government (18 U.S.C., 2010).
An uncontrollable urge to do something. Irresistible impulse is not usually a defence in law and it will not afford a defence of insanity, unless it arises out of a disease of the mind as defined by the McNaghten Rules.
Under the "Irresistible Impulse" test a jury may find a defendant not guilty by reason of insanity where the defendant was laboring under a mental disease or defect that compelled them to commit the object offense.
- criminallaw.uslegal.com
- › Defense of Insanity
Such a test would encompass not only whether defendants know right from wrong but also whether they could control their impulses to commit wrong-doing. The Irresistible Impulse Test was first adopted by the Alabama Supreme Court in the 1887 case of Parsons v. State.
Irresistible Impulse Defense. The irresistible impulse defense comes out of two other insanity defenses that have been used for a long time. The first one, called “The M’Naughten Rule” is based on a notorious English case involving an assassin in the early 1800s.
By EDWIN R. KEEDY t. I. One of the most controversial questions in the field of Criminal Law is whether an irresistible impulse, produced by mental disease, should be a defense to a charge of crime. Statutes, court decisions and the opinions of writers are in direct conflict.
