Search results
Project 985 (Chinese: 985工程) was a higher education development and sponsorship scheme of the Chinese central government for creating world-class higher education institutions, initiated in May 1998. There were 39 universities selected to be part of this program.
Aug 11, 2020 · The purpose of Project 985 is to create elite universities from the 39 universities under the 211 Project. It also aims to promote international cooperation and exchange, and attract international students. Project 985 initially provided more funding to 9 Chinese universities.
Learn about the Chinese government's projects to strengthen higher education and key disciplinary areas as a national priority for the 21st century. Find out the list of universities in Project 211 and 985 and their goals and achievements.
People also ask
What is Project 985?
What happened to Project 985?
How many universities are in Project 985?
Did Chinese universities benefit more from the 985 Project?
Project 985 (Chinese: 985工程; pinyin: Jiǔbāwǔ gōngchéng) is a project that was first announced by CPC General secretary and Chinese President Jiang Zemin at the 100th anniversary of Peking University on May 4, 1998, to promote the development and reputation of the Chinese higher education system by founding world-class universities in ...
Feb 6, 2018 · The Chinese government released the World-Class 2.0 project, replacing the 211 and 985 projects, and aiming to become a global higher education center. Institutional autonomy, academic freedom, academic corruption and the dominant Western academic system remain critical challenges.
Apr 25, 2021 · However, in 2015, the promulgation of the Overall Plan for Promoting the Construction of World-class Universities and First-class Disciplines (Double-first-class Plan in short) replaced the ‘211’ and ‘985’ and became the new most important policy in China’s higher education.
Apr 1, 2013 · The 985 Project is the most dramatic of a series of policies implemented by the government to move selected Chinese universities to the global scientific and technological frontier. Our results suggest that the lower-tier universities may have benefited more than did the first-tier universities.
