Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. From one perspective, Chinas ascent is the latest example of the ten- STEPHEN M. WALT is professor of political science and master of the social science colle- giate division at the University of Chicago.

    • 889KB
    • 17
  3. Abstract: The study of international affairs is best understood as a continuing competition between the realist, liberal, and radical traditions. Walt explains each of these paradigms as well as some constructivist theories. Full Text: Copyright Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Spring 1998.

    • 31KB
    • 6
  4. Realism emphasizes the enduring propensity for conflict between states; liberalism identifies several ways to mitigate these conflictive tendencies; and the radical tradition describes how the entire system of state relations might be transformed.

  5. Oct 26, 2009 · Six years ago, political scientist Stephen M. Walt published a much-cited survey of the field in these pages (“One World, Many Theories,” Spring 1998). He sketched out three dominant ...

    • Jack Snyder
  6. International Relations: One World, Many Theories. S. Walt. Published 1998. Political Science. Foreign Policy. Why should policymakers and practitioners care about the scholarly study of international affairs?

  7. International Relations: One World, Many Theories Stephen M. Walt Foreign Policy, No. 110, Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge. (Spring, 1998), pp. 29-32+34-46.

  8. International relations: One world, many theories. Walt, Stephen M. Foreign Policy; Washington Iss. 110, (Spring 1998): 29-35+.

  1. People also search for