Search results
Strict scrutiny. In U.S. constitutional law, when a law infringes upon a fundamental constitutional right, the court may apply the strict scrutiny standard. Strict scrutiny holds the challenged law as presumptively invalid unless the government can demonstrate that the law or regulation is necessary to achieve a "compelling state interest".
The meaning of STRICT SCRUTINY is the highest level of judicial scrutiny that is applied especially to a law that allegedly violates equal protection in order to determine if it is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest.
Mar 15, 2016 · The term strict scrutiny refers to a level of study or analysis the courts use to determine the constitutionality of a law, or of the actions of a governmental body. The most rigid standard of judicial review, strict scrutiny is used to determine whether such an action or legislation violates constitutional rights.
strict scrutiny - A criteria courts use to assess the legality of a statute when it touches on a fundamental right or is related to a vulnerable group under the equal protection clause. The court evaluates if the government has a pressing need to enact the law, whether the law is specifically designed to achieve the government's goals, and if ...
Strict scrutiny is the highest standard of review which a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination. The other two standards are intermediate scrutiny and rational basis review. Application Equal Protection. Strict scrutiny will often be invoked in an equal protection claim.
Federal courts use strict scrutiny to determine whether certain types of government policies are constitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court has applied this standard to laws or policies that impinge on a right explicitly protected by the U.S. Constitution, such as the right to vote.
23 hours ago · Strict scrutiny is a legal term that describes the careful evaluation of laws to make sure they're constitutional. Courts use strict scrutiny to examine a law's constitutionality after someone sues the government for discrimination. The government has to prove that the law is absolutely necessary in order to justify the possible infringement of ...
