Search results
Mar 19, 2004 · 3. The Chinese Room Argument. In 1980 John Searle published “Minds, Brains and Programs” in the journal The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. In this article, Searle sets out the argument, and then replies to the half-dozen main objections that had been raised during his earlier presentations at various university campuses (see next section).
- Author and Citation Info
We would like to show you a description here but the site...
- Turing Test
However, there is one argument—Searle’s “Chinese Room”...
- Author and Citation Info
Chinese room argument by John Searle on Scholarpedia The Chinese Room Argument , part 4 of the September 2, 1999 interview with Searle Philosophy and the Habits of Critical Thinking Archived 2010-06-13 at the Wayback Machine in the Conversations With History series
Jun 5, 2024 · Chinese room argument, thought experiment by the American philosopher John Searle, first presented in his journal article “Minds, Brains, and Programs” (1980), designed to show that the central claim of what Searle called strong artificial intelligence (AI)—that human thought or intelligence can be
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
The Chinese Room by John Searle excerpted from: Minds, Brains, and Programs (1980) … I have no objection to the claims of weak AI, at least as far as this article is concerned. My discussion here will be directed at the claims I have defined as those of strong AI, specifically the claim that the appropriately programmed computer
- 12KB
- 3
A thought experiment by John Searle to challenge the idea that computers can think or understand language. Searle argues that computers are just manipulating meaningless symbols and lack the semantics that only brains can provide.
An argument against computers ever being truly intelligent.(Part 3 of 6)Playlist link - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL73A886F2DD959FF1Transcript li...
- 1 min
- 708.6K
- OpenLearn from The Open University
Learn about the paradox created by John Searle to challenge the idea that computers can understand languages and have minds like humans. See how the paradox works, what arguments it makes, and what examples and criticisms it involves.
