Search results
Nov 7, 2016 · The original Anti‐ Federalists were wrong on many things—the federal government, for example, did not obliterate and override states’ powers to tax their citizens—but they got three...
Jul 13, 2018 · Anti-Federalists. “Anti-Federalist” describes the philosophical and political position of individuals who, during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and the subsequent state ratification debates (1787–89), generally opposed the constitution proposed to replace the Articles of Confederation.
People also ask
Who were the Antifederalists?
What are some examples of anti-federalist thinking?
How did the Anti-Federalist Movement Affect American politics?
What does Anti-Federalist mean?
Why the name Antifederalist? Who were the Antifederalists and what did they stand for? The name, Antifederalists, captures both an attachment to certain political principles as well as standing in favor and against trends that were appearing in late 18th century America.
Anti-Federalist leaders included individuals such as Patrick Henry of Virginia and Samuel Adams of Massachusetts. Though brief in existence, the Anti-Federalist movement (1787–89) and the Anti-Federalist Party (1789–1800) exerted a profound and lasting effect on American politics.
The Antifederalists (George Mason, Edmund Randolph, Elbridge Gerry, also John Hancock, Sam Adams and Richard Henry Lee, Patrick Henry) were mistrustful of government, especially strong national government. They argued that: • Representative government could work only in a small community of citizens with similar interests and beliefs.
Nov 20, 2022 · Faber uses Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts and “Brutus” of New York as his primary examples. Finally, Democratic Anti-Federalists, strongest in western and rural areas, “wanted to see a more positive and direct role for the people in any government.” “Centinel” of Pennsylvania serves as Faber’s example of this thinking.
As Federalists emerged from the Philadelphia Convention’s eventual success in ratifying the new US Constitution, deep divisions remained among those who feared the Constitution was designed to destroy the democratic autonomy of the individual states that the confederation had enshrined.
