Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. In common law, the “scintilla of evidence” doctrine is used in courts to determine the amount of evidence required to sustain a decision. According to this doctrine, a motion for a directed verdict or summary judgment cannot be granted if there is even the slightest amount of relevant evidence, which implies that the matter will be sent to ...

  3. Scintilla of evidence has been defined as “a mere spark, gleam, glimmer, i.e., the smallest trace, of evidence in support of a plaintiff's claim.” Substantial evidence, on the other hand has more probative value.

  4. The scintilla-of-evidence rule is a legal principle that states that if there is even a small amount of relevant evidence on an issue, then a motion for summary judgment or directed verdict cannot be granted, and the issue must go to the jury.

  5. What is Scintilla of Evidence Rule? A common law principle that a motion for summary judgment or for directed verdict cannot be granted when there exists even the slightest amount of relevant evidence on the subject issue. The matter should then be tried by a jury.

  6. Definition & Citations: the term that is applied to a particle of evidence that may be insignificant.

  7. Mar 15, 2022 · As the Court of Appeals confirmed in its Dismas decision, all that is needed to “tend to show” that a condition is met is something more than a “scintilla” (in other words, a tiny trace) of evidence.

  8. May 17, 2018 · "Scintilla of evidence" is a metaphorical expression describing a very insignificant or trifling item of evidence. The common-law rule provides that if there is any evidence at all in a case, even a mere scintilla, that tends to support a material issue, the case cannot be taken from the jury but must be left to its decision.

  1. People also search for