Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Jul 5, 2010 · You’ll also find an article on “Dubious Genetic Testing” co-authored by the Quackwatch founder, Stephen Barrett, and our own Harriet Hall, and an article about bogus “biomedical treatments” for autism showing that—surprise!—Doctor’s Data and Genova Diagnostics are major players there, too.

  2. Aug 26, 2016 · They sued a retired psychiatrist, Dr. Stephen J. Barrett, of Chapel Hill, North Carolina, and his Quackwatch website, saying they learned in 2014 that the defendants' five-sentence 2000...

  3. According to the Quackwatch website, Stephen Barrett, M.D. says this about quackery: Dictionaries define quack as "a pretender to medical skill; a charlatan" and "one who talks pretentiously without sound knowledge of the subject discussed." Stephen Barrett, M.D. does not have a degree in nutrition science.

  4. Loses Major Defamation Case in his own Hometown. In a stunning development, Lehigh Valley Pennsylvania Judge J. Brian Johnson on Thursday, October 13, 2005, tossed out nationally known self-proclaimed "consumer medical advocate" Stephen Barrett’s defamation lawsuit just minutes before it was going to be considered by a local jury.

  5. We had the opportunity to interview Dr. Stephen Barrett, M.D., a staunch advocate for science and a formidable opponent of quackery. Given Dr. Barrett’s longstanding efforts in these areas, it seemed fitting that he would be the first to be interviewed in the debut of Science in Autism Treatment.

  6. November 1, 2019 by Stephen Barrett, M.D. In November 1993, my wife and I began receiving phone calls from at least two chiropractic offices urging us to come for a free chiropractic evaluation. At first we ignored these calls, but when they persisted I realized that they presented me with a remarkable opportunity.

  7. People also ask

  8. January 8, 2004 by Stephen Barrett, M.D. In December 1998, as noted below, America Online (AOL) filed a suit charging that Jason Vale, doing business as Christian Brothers, had fraudulently generated junk e-mail using the AOL.com address and creating the false impression that the e-mails had either been sent or endorsed by AOL.

  1. People also search for